Re: [PATCH] PM: suspend: Rename pm_suspend_via_s2idle()

2019-06-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 2:19 AM Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > Hi Rafael, > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 10:18:28AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > The name of pm_suspend_via_s2idle() is confusing, as it doesn't > > reflect the purpose of the function precisely enough

Re: [PATCH] PM: suspend: Rename pm_suspend_via_s2idle()

2019-06-18 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
Hi Rafael, On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 10:18:28AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > The name of pm_suspend_via_s2idle() is confusing, as it doesn't > reflect the purpose of the function precisely enough and it is > very similar to pm_suspend_via_firmware(), which has a di

[PATCH] PM: suspend: Rename pm_suspend_via_s2idle()

2019-06-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Rafael J. Wysocki The name of pm_suspend_via_s2idle() is confusing, as it doesn't reflect the purpose of the function precisely enough and it is very similar to pm_suspend_via_firmware(), which has a different purpose, so rename it as pm_suspend_default_s2idle() and update its only caller,