On 15-10-15, 23:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Well, to be honest, I would prefer a replacement.
Ahh, I thought you will suggest a separate patch so that you don't
need to rebase your tree. But I don't have any issues with a new
version of the patch.
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: s
On Thursday, October 15, 2015 08:07:38 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 15-10-15, 09:42, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > Do you want me to resend a new version? Or a follow-up patch based on
> > the latest tree from Rafael now that he has applied the previous version?
>
> A follow up patch, without any Fix
On 15-10-15, 09:42, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Do you want me to resend a new version? Or a follow-up patch based on
> the latest tree from Rafael now that he has applied the previous version?
A follow up patch, without any Fixes tag would be fine.
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
Viresh, Rafael,
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:05:44 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 14-10-15, 17:52, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > ret = of_init_opp_table(cpu_dev);
> > if (ret) {
> > - pr_err("%s: couldn't find opp table for cpu:%d, %d\n",
> > -
On 14-10-15, 17:52, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> ret = of_init_opp_table(cpu_dev);
> if (ret) {
> - pr_err("%s: couldn't find opp table for cpu:%d, %d\n",
> -__func__, cpu, ret);
> -
It should have be modified to pr_debug() a
On Wednesday, October 14, 2015 11:29:27 PM Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 23:44:03 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, October 14, 2015 11:10:39 PM Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > > Rafael,
> > >
> > > On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 23:28:51 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote
Rafael,
On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 23:59:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Yes, I wasn't sure if it really is a fix, and if so, which commit it is
> > fixing. It is really 8d4d4e98acd68c31435ebb7beea591dbf60b9eb2 that
> > introduces the confusing message, but the message will not appear until
> > t
Hello,
On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 23:44:03 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 14, 2015 11:10:39 PM Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > Rafael,
> >
> > On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 23:28:51 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > > > To avoid this confusion, this patch simply deletes the error messa
On Wednesday, October 14, 2015 11:10:39 PM Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Rafael,
>
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 23:28:51 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > > To avoid this confusion, this patch simply deletes the error message.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni
> >
> > That's only present in
Rafael,
On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 23:28:51 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > To avoid this confusion, this patch simply deletes the error message.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni
>
> That's only present in linux-next now, right?
No, it is already in 4.3-rc since 4.3-rc1. The commit adding
On Wednesday, October 14, 2015 05:52:23 PM Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> The of_cpumask_init_opp_table() function will print an error message
> (with pr_err) if it cannot find the OPP table for a certain CPU in the
> Device Tree.
>
> There are users of the cpufreq-dt driver (which is the one calling
>
The of_cpumask_init_opp_table() function will print an error message
(with pr_err) if it cannot find the OPP table for a certain CPU in the
Device Tree.
There are users of the cpufreq-dt driver (which is the one calling
of_cpumask_init_opp_table) that do not have the OPP points defined in
the Devi
12 matches
Mail list logo
