Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

2017-04-09 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 10-04-17, 08:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Yes, keeping both make most sense, I think. > > Anyway, I found now the original report thread of Masahiro and I see > Mark's response about using '-'. In that case I am fine with this. I > would prefer to take only the exynos part (separated to ARM

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

2017-04-09 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 10-04-17, 15:30, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> 2017-04-10 15:22 GMT+09:00 Viresh Kumar : >> > On 10-04-17, 10:46, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> >> Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows: >> >> >> >> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

2017-04-09 Thread Chanwoo Choi
Hi, On 2017년 04월 10일 14:16, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows: > > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@10 has a > unit name, but no reg property > > Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will never have a > "reg" pr

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

2017-04-09 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 10-04-17, 15:30, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > 2017-04-10 15:22 GMT+09:00 Viresh Kumar : > > On 10-04-17, 10:46, Viresh Kumar wrote: > >> Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows: > >> > >> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@10 has a > >> unit name, but no reg p

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

2017-04-09 Thread Masahiro Yamada
2017-04-10 15:22 GMT+09:00 Viresh Kumar : > On 10-04-17, 10:46, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows: >> >> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@10 has a >> unit name, but no reg property >> >> Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

2017-04-09 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 10-04-17, 10:46, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows: > > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@10 has a > unit name, but no reg property > > Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will never have a > "reg" property. >

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

2017-04-09 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows: > > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@10 has a > unit name, but no reg property > > Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will never have a > "reg"

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

2017-04-09 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:46:37AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows: > > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@10 has a > unit name, but no reg property > > Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will never have

[PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

2017-04-09 Thread Viresh Kumar
Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@10 has a unit name, but no reg property Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will never have a "reg" property. Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada Signed-off-by: Viresh Ku