On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 01:33:13AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>>
>> It should not be necessary to resume devices with ignore_children set
>> in pci_pm_prepare(), because they should be resumed explcitly by
>>
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:34 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 01:33:13AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>>
>> It should not be necessary to resume devices with ignore_children set
>> in pci_pm_prepare(), because they should be resumed explcitly by
>
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 01:33:13AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> It should not be necessary to resume devices with ignore_children set
> in pci_pm_prepare(), because they should be resumed explcitly by
> their children drivers during suspend if need be and they wil
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 01:33:13AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> It should not be necessary to resume devices with ignore_children set
> in pci_pm_prepare(), because they should be resumed explcitly by
s/explcitly/explicitly/
> their children drivers during suspe
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
It should not be necessary to resume devices with ignore_children set
in pci_pm_prepare(), because they should be resumed explcitly by
their children drivers during suspend if need be and they will be
resumed by pci_pm_suspend() after that anyway, so avoid doing that.
Sig
5 matches
Mail list logo