Re: [PATCH] PM / devfreq: Rewrite devfreq_update_status() to fix multiple bugs

2014-03-04 Thread Saravana Kannan
On 03/04/2014 02:06 AM, MyungJoo Ham wrote: >> The current devfreq_update_status() has the following bugs: >> - If previous frequency doesn't have a valid level, it does an out of bounds >>access into the trans_table and causes memory corruption. >> - When the new frequency doesn't have a

Re: [PATCH] PM / devfreq: Rewrite devfreq_update_status() to fix multiple bugs

2014-03-04 Thread MyungJoo Ham
> The current devfreq_update_status() has the following bugs: > - If previous frequency doesn't have a valid level, it does an out of bounds > access into the trans_table and causes memory corruption. > - When the new frequency doesn't have a valid level, the time spent in the > new frequency

Re: [PATCH] PM / devfreq: Rewrite devfreq_update_status() to fix multiple bugs

2014-03-04 Thread MyungJoo Ham
The current devfreq_update_status() has the following bugs: - If previous frequency doesn't have a valid level, it does an out of bounds access into the trans_table and causes memory corruption. - When the new frequency doesn't have a valid level, the time spent in the new frequency is

Re: [PATCH] PM / devfreq: Rewrite devfreq_update_status() to fix multiple bugs

2014-03-04 Thread Saravana Kannan
On 03/04/2014 02:06 AM, MyungJoo Ham wrote: The current devfreq_update_status() has the following bugs: - If previous frequency doesn't have a valid level, it does an out of bounds access into the trans_table and causes memory corruption. - When the new frequency doesn't have a valid level,

Re: [PATCH] PM / devfreq: Rewrite devfreq_update_status() to fix multiple bugs

2014-03-03 Thread Saravana Kannan
On 02/27/2014 07:38 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: The current devfreq_update_status() has the following bugs: - If previous frequency doesn't have a valid level, it does an out of bounds access into the trans_table and causes memory corruption. - When the new frequency doesn't have a valid

Re: [PATCH] PM / devfreq: Rewrite devfreq_update_status() to fix multiple bugs

2014-03-03 Thread Saravana Kannan
On 02/27/2014 07:38 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: The current devfreq_update_status() has the following bugs: - If previous frequency doesn't have a valid level, it does an out of bounds access into the trans_table and causes memory corruption. - When the new frequency doesn't have a valid

[PATCH] PM / devfreq: Rewrite devfreq_update_status() to fix multiple bugs

2014-02-27 Thread Saravana Kannan
The current devfreq_update_status() has the following bugs: - If previous frequency doesn't have a valid level, it does an out of bounds access into the trans_table and causes memory corruption. - When the new frequency doesn't have a valid level, the time spent in the new frequency is counted

[PATCH] PM / devfreq: Rewrite devfreq_update_status() to fix multiple bugs

2014-02-27 Thread Saravana Kannan
The current devfreq_update_status() has the following bugs: - If previous frequency doesn't have a valid level, it does an out of bounds access into the trans_table and causes memory corruption. - When the new frequency doesn't have a valid level, the time spent in the new frequency is counted