On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 01:03:54PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> or perhaps better, making the sysrq-m information
> available via either /proc or /sys?
or debugfs ?
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 10:33:32AM +, Alan wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 23:37:43 -0500
> Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Is this patch a consistency thing?
> >
> > The goal of the patch was to avoid filling /var/log/messages huge
> > amounts of sysrq text. Some of the sysrq comma
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 10:33:32AM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 23:37:43 -0500
> Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Is this patch a consistency thing?
> >
> > The goal of the patch was to avoid filling /var/log/messages huge
> > amounts of sysrq text. Some of the s
On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 23:37:43 -0500
Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is this patch a consistency thing?
>
> The goal of the patch was to avoid filling /var/log/messages huge
> amounts of sysrq text. Some of the sysrq commands, especially sysrq-m
> and sysrq-t emit a truly vast amount of
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 08:42:47PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 22:24:53 -0500
> "Theodore Ts'o" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Print messages resulting from sysrq-m with a KERN_INFO instead of the
> > default KERN_WARNING priority
>
> hm, I wonder why. If someone does sys
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 11:19:49PM -0600, * * wrote:
> Was this patch tested?
>
> > static inline void show_node(struct zone *zone)
> > {
> >if (NUMA_BUILD)
> >- printk("Node %d ", zone_to_nid(zone));
> >+ printk(KERN_INFO, "Node %d ", zone_to_nid(zone));
>
> H
Was this patch tested?
On 12/29/06, Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Print messages resulting from sysrq-m with a KERN_INFO instead of the
default KERN_WARNING priority
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6/mm/page_alloc.c
=
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 08:42:47PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 22:24:53 -0500
> "Theodore Ts'o" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Print messages resulting from sysrq-m with a KERN_INFO instead of the
> > default KERN_WARNING priority
>
> hm, I wonder why. If someone d
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 22:24:53 -0500
"Theodore Ts'o" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Print messages resulting from sysrq-m with a KERN_INFO instead of the
> default KERN_WARNING priority
hm, I wonder why. If someone does sysrq- then they presumably want
to display the result? Tricky.
Is this patch
Print messages resulting from sysrq-m with a KERN_INFO instead of the
default KERN_WARNING priority
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6/mm/page_alloc.c
===
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/page_alloc.c 2006-
10 matches
Mail list logo
