[PATCH] procfs guide

2001-06-03 Thread Erik Mouw
Hi, I got some comments on my procfs guide when I posted it a couple of days ago, so here is a new version. What's new: - add revision history (Jonathan Lundel) - remove_proc_entry() is not recursive (Jonathan Lundel) - numerous spelling correcti

Re: [PATCH] Procfs Guide

2001-05-31 Thread Matti Aarnio
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 03:10:32PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So where can find the whole docbook ? I could not find under > linux/Documentation directory. The "docbook" is SGML DTD suite. Analogous to "lets write it in HTML.." See readymade packages needed to convert DOCBOOK style

Re: [PATCH] Procfs Guide

2001-05-30 Thread Erik Mouw
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 03:10:32PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So where can find the whole docbook ? I could not find under > linux/Documentation directory. That's correct, I only submitted it for inclusion into the kernel, so it's not yet there. Just patch your kernel source with my patch

RE: [PATCH] Procfs Guide

2001-05-30 Thread hiren_mehta
c: Linux kernel mailing list; Alan Cox > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Procfs Guide > > > On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 09:30:48AM +0100, Tim Waugh wrote: > > On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 01:29:17AM +0200, Erik Mouw wrote: > > > I'm still looking for a proper way to automatically > i

Re: [PATCH] Procfs Guide

2001-05-30 Thread Erik Mouw
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 09:30:48AM +0100, Tim Waugh wrote: > On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 01:29:17AM +0200, Erik Mouw wrote: > > I'm still looking for a proper way to automatically include the example > > source into the SGML file, this patch with the same content in two > > files is a bit of an ugly h

Re: [PATCH] Procfs Guide

2001-05-30 Thread Tim Waugh
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 01:29:17AM +0200, Erik Mouw wrote: > I'm still looking for a proper way to automatically include the example > source into the SGML file, this patch with the same content in two > files is a bit of an ugly hack. Probably your best bet is to get the Makefile to pass a copy