On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 08:21:49AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 04:59:51PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > >
> > > PS. I got rid of your rcu_preeempt_task for rcu_preempt_tasks ;-)
> > >
> > > (No the above is _not_ a
--
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 04:59:51PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > PS. I got rid of your rcu_preeempt_task for rcu_preempt_tasks ;-)
> >
> > (No the above is _not_ a typo)
>
> :-/
I thought it was some mind bender thing ;-)
>
> > Signed-off
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 04:59:51PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Paul,
>
> I ran your original preemption test of RCU torture, and after several
> minutes, my preempt boost patch had one Preemption stall. I then
> disabled preemption boosting, and ran the preempt torture again, and it
> seemed t
Paul,
I ran your original preemption test of RCU torture, and after several
minutes, my preempt boost patch had one Preemption stall. I then
disabled preemption boosting, and ran the preempt torture again, and it
seemed to never stall. Something seemed strange, so I took a look.
Looks like you
4 matches
Mail list logo