On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 05:30:58PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Matthew didn't reply to this, almost surely because you removed him
> (and David) from the cc. Please don't ever do that.
Ah, I saw this on linux-acpi and replied to it there. There's no entries
in the options file and the resourc
On Mon, 28 May 2007 18:50:22 + (UTC)
Matthieu CASTET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Mon, 28 May 2007 18:24:18 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> > From: Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Intel Macs (and possibly other machines) provide a PNP entry for the
> > RTC, but p
On Monday 28 May 2007, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> From: Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Intel Macs (and possibly other machines) provide a PNP entry for the
> RTC, but provide no IRQ. As a result the rtc-cmos driver doesn't allow
> wakeup alarms. If the RTC is located at the legacy ioport
Hi,
On Mon, 28 May 2007 18:24:18 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> From: Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Intel Macs (and possibly other machines) provide a PNP entry for the
> RTC, but provide no IRQ. As a result the rtc-cmos driver doesn't allow
> wakeup alarms. If the RTC is located at
From: Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Intel Macs (and possibly other machines) provide a PNP entry for the
RTC, but provide no IRQ. As a result the rtc-cmos driver doesn't allow
wakeup alarms. If the RTC is located at the legacy ioport range, assume
that it's on IRQ 8 unless the tables say
5 matches
Mail list logo