Re: [PATCH] RTC: Use fallback IRQ if PNP tables don't provide one

2007-05-29 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 05:30:58PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Matthew didn't reply to this, almost surely because you removed him > (and David) from the cc. Please don't ever do that. Ah, I saw this on linux-acpi and replied to it there. There's no entries in the options file and the resourc

Re: [PATCH] RTC: Use fallback IRQ if PNP tables don't provide one

2007-05-29 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 28 May 2007 18:50:22 + (UTC) Matthieu CASTET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > On Mon, 28 May 2007 18:24:18 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > From: Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Intel Macs (and possibly other machines) provide a PNP entry for the > > RTC, but p

Re: [PATCH] RTC: Use fallback IRQ if PNP tables don't provide one

2007-05-28 Thread David Brownell
On Monday 28 May 2007, Matthew Garrett wrote: > From: Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Intel Macs (and possibly other machines) provide a PNP entry for the > RTC, but provide no IRQ. As a result the rtc-cmos driver doesn't allow > wakeup alarms. If the RTC is located at the legacy ioport

Re: [PATCH] RTC: Use fallback IRQ if PNP tables don't provide one

2007-05-28 Thread Matthieu CASTET
Hi, On Mon, 28 May 2007 18:24:18 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > From: Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Intel Macs (and possibly other machines) provide a PNP entry for the > RTC, but provide no IRQ. As a result the rtc-cmos driver doesn't allow > wakeup alarms. If the RTC is located at

[PATCH] RTC: Use fallback IRQ if PNP tables don't provide one

2007-05-28 Thread Matthew Garrett
From: Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Intel Macs (and possibly other machines) provide a PNP entry for the RTC, but provide no IRQ. As a result the rtc-cmos driver doesn't allow wakeup alarms. If the RTC is located at the legacy ioport range, assume that it's on IRQ 8 unless the tables say