Roland McGrath wrote:
There are other concerns. Let me see if I understand this. A thread
(other than the leader) can exec and we then need to change the
real_timer to wake the new task which will NOT be using the same task
struct.
That's correct. de_thread will turn the thread calling ex
> There are other concerns. Let me see if I understand this. A thread
> (other than the leader) can exec and we then need to change the
> real_timer to wake the new task which will NOT be using the same task
> struct.
That's correct. de_thread will turn the thread calling exec into the new
l
Gerd Knorr wrote:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 03:02:51PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's wrong. It has to be done only by the last thread in the group to go.
Just revert Ingo's change.
OK..
+++ 25-akpm/kernel/exit.c Thu Aug 4 15:01:06 2005
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 03:02:51PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > That's wrong. It has to be done only by the last thread in the group to go.
> > Just revert Ingo's change.
> >
>
> OK..
>
> +++ 25-akpm/kernel/exit.c Thu Aug 4 15:01:06 2005
>
That's wrong. It has to be done only by the last thread in the group to go.
Just revert Ingo's change.
Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-i
Andrew Morton wrote:
Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's wrong. It has to be done only by the last thread in the group to go.
Just revert Ingo's change.
Hm... I was looking at 2.6.10 to figure it out. This looks more correct.
OK..
--- 25/kernel/exit.c~revert-timer-exit-cle
Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That's wrong. It has to be done only by the last thread in the group to go.
> Just revert Ingo's change.
>
OK..
--- 25/kernel/exit.c~revert-timer-exit-cleanup Thu Aug 4 15:00:55 2005
+++ 25-akpm/kernel/exit.c Thu Aug 4 15:01:06 2005
@@ -829
George Anzinger wrote:
>
> Source: MontaVista Software, Inc. George Anzinger
> Type: Defect Fix
> Description:
>
> The changes to itimer of late (after 2.6.11) cause itimers not
> to survive the exec* calls. Standard says they should.
>
> Signed-off-by: George Anzinger
>
> exi
Gerd Knorr wrote:
Hi,
Somewhere between 2.6.11 and 2.6.12 the regression in $subject
was added to the linux kernel. Testcase below.
Yep. The itimer changes got a bit carried away. Here is a fix.
--
George Anzinger george@mvista.com
HRT (High-res-timers): http://sourceforge.net/project
9 matches
Mail list logo
