On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:10:48AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > This config item has not carried much meaning for a while now and is
> > almost always enabled by default. Remove it and adjust various config
> > logic and documentation.
>
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> This config item has not carried much meaning for a while now and is
> almost always enabled by default. Remove it and adjust various config
> logic and documentation.
It does have meaning... !CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL means more stable. In
the past
Kees Cook writes:
> This config item has not carried much meaning for a while now and is
> almost always enabled by default. Remove it and adjust various config
> logic and documentation.
Acked-by: Rusty Russell (lguest part)
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsu
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:18:45PM +, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 03:48:09PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> Definately NAK for the MIPS segments. Some of the EXPERIMENTAL
> dependencies should be removed but many options tagged with EXPERIMENTAL
> are still dangerous.
>
Like
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 03:48:09PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Definately NAK for the MIPS segments. Some of the EXPERIMENTAL
dependencies should be removed but many options tagged with EXPERIMENTAL
are still dangerous.
Ralf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kern
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 05:35:32PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > So smbfs is still considered rock solid while no serious distribution
> > would be crazy enough to ship the EXPERIMENTAL NFSv4 support to their
> > customers?
>
> Thats a different problem. The kernel as I've said many times has no
>
On 1/1/08, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm not claiming that all EXPERIMENTAL tags were wrong [1], but many
> > were wrong.
>
> So why not fix the wrong tags, and mark smbfs obsolete ?
>
> > Plus the fact that CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL controlled so many different
> > things with one switch t
On Jan 1 2008 14:30, Alan Cox wrote:
>> * Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > This patch removes the EXPERIMENTAL option and all dependencies on
>> > EXPERIMENTAL since they are pointless.
>>
>> agreed. CONFIG_BROKEN has real use - but CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL is pretty
>> pointless in t
> So smbfs is still considered rock solid while no serious distribution
> would be crazy enough to ship the EXPERIMENTAL NFSv4 support to their
> customers?
Thats a different problem. The kernel as I've said many times has no
proper process for
- removing expired/missing maintainers
- handling
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 04:07:08PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 17:17:51 +0200
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 02:23:44PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 15:48:09 +0200
> > > Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 17:17:51 +0200
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 02:23:44PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 15:48:09 +0200
> > Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > This patch removes the EXPERIMENTAL option and all dependencies on
> > >
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 02:23:44PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 15:48:09 +0200
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This patch removes the EXPERIMENTAL option and all dependencies on
> > EXPERIMENTAL since they are pointless.
>
> NAK
>
> Experimental is an important guid
* Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...] As the alternative is
>
> CONFIG_ATA_EXPERIMENTAL, CONFIG_NET_EXPERIMENTAL,
> CONFIG_VIDEO_EXPERIMENTAL, ... all being added by developers
yeah, i'd prefer that. People might be willing to enable an experimental
video driver but not an experimental
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 02:30:22PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 15:26:23 +0100
> Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > * Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > This patch removes the EXPERIMENTAL option and all dependencies on
> > > EXPERIMENTAL since they ar
On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 15:26:23 +0100
Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This patch removes the EXPERIMENTAL option and all dependencies on
> > EXPERIMENTAL since they are pointless.
>
> agreed. CONFIG_BROKEN has real use - but CONFIG_EXPERIME
On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 15:48:09 +0200
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch removes the EXPERIMENTAL option and all dependencies on
> EXPERIMENTAL since they are pointless.
NAK
Experimental is an important guide to driver and code quality.
"It might have been differently 10 years ago
* Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch removes the EXPERIMENTAL option and all dependencies on
> EXPERIMENTAL since they are pointless.
agreed. CONFIG_BROKEN has real use - but CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL is pretty
pointless in the 90-days kernel development model.
Acked-by: Ingo Molna
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch removes the EXPERIMENTAL option and all dependencies on
> EXPERIMENTAL because they are pointless.
Unfortunately I have to agree. The only think it does is confusing
users, when they forget to enable it.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
-
To unsubscribe f
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:34:11 EST, Dave Jones said:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:44:44PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I suspect that given the "once it escapes, it's cast in stone" view we take
> > towards user-visible API/etc, there isn't much *real* room for an
> > 'EXPERIMENTAL' fla
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:44:44PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I suspect that given the "once it escapes, it's cast in stone" view we take
> towards user-visible API/etc, there isn't much *real* room for an
> 'EXPERIMENTAL' flag anymore. Most of the usage should probably be confined
>
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:27:07 GMT, Pavel Machek said:
> I don't think this is good idea. But perhaps 'experimental' should be
> removed from stuff that is really stable these days, like SATA?
I suspect that given the "once it escapes, it's cast in stone" view we take
towards user-visible API/etc,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 12:27:07PM +, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Sun 2007-11-25 17:16:31, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > This patch removes the EXPERIMENTAL option and all dependencies on
> > EXPERIMENTAL because they are pointless.
> >
> > Complete rationale:
> > - Many people and all distributions ar
On Sun 2007-11-25 17:16:31, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch removes the EXPERIMENTAL option and all dependencies on
> EXPERIMENTAL because they are pointless.
>
> Complete rationale:
> - Many people and all distributions are currently forced to enable
> CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL since the options for
23 matches
Mail list logo
