Re: [PATCH] Remove fastcall references in x86_64 code.

2007-01-03 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 07:09:30PM -0200, Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote: > Unlike x86, x86_64 already passes arguments in registers. >... Nitpick: In 2.6.20-rc: s/x86/UML on x86/ cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There

[PATCH] Remove fastcall references in x86_64 code.

2007-01-02 Thread Glauber de Oliveira Costa
Oops ;-) resending, as I forgot to sign last version: Unlike x86, x86_64 already passes arguments in registers. The use of regparm attribute makes no difference in produced code, and the use of fastcall just bloats the code. Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Glaube

[PATCH] Remove fastcall references in x86_64 code.

2007-01-02 Thread Glauber de Oliveira Costa
Unlike x86, x86_64 already passes arguments in registers. The use of regparm attribute makes no difference in produced code, and the use of fastcall just bloats the code. -- Glauber de Oliveira Costa Red Hat Inc. "Free as in Freedom" diff -rup linux-2.6.19.1-devel/arch/x86_64/kernel/acpi/sleep.c