On Wed, 27 Dec 2006, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Remove Kconfig comparisons of the form FUBAR || FUBAR=n, since they
> > appear to be superfluous.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > based on what i rea
Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Remove Kconfig comparisons of the form FUBAR || FUBAR=n, since they
> appear to be superfluous.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ---
>
> based on what i read in kconfig-language.txt, it would *appear* that
> those compa
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Russell King wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 05:14:01AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > Remove Kconfig comparisons of the form FUBAR || FUBAR=n, since they
> > appear to be superfluous.
>
> config FOO
> tristate 'foo'
> depends on BAR || BAR=n
>
> is not supe
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 05:14:01AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> Remove Kconfig comparisons of the form FUBAR || FUBAR=n, since they
> appear to be superfluous.
config FOO
tristate 'foo'
depends on BAR || BAR=n
is not superfluous. The allowed states for FOO with the above co
Remove Kconfig comparisons of the form FUBAR || FUBAR=n, since they
appear to be superfluous.
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
based on what i read in kconfig-language.txt, it would *appear* that
those comparisons are redundant, but i'm willing to be convinced
otherwi
5 matches
Mail list logo