On 19/04/13 06:58, Greg KH wrote:
This patch gives the option to switch off that behavior - if your BIOS
has neither BGRT - nor bugs that require mapping of EFI boot code/data
No, never add new boot options, no users, or distros, know to set them.
Isn't there some way we can dynamically determi
Nope, just a vehicle for experiments.
Greg KH wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:00:27PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> The only real use for command line options is to be able to get users
>> to test something during troubleshooting.
>
>Ok, but the option shouldn't be used to "solve" the probl
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:00:27PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> The only real use for command line options is to be able to get users
> to test something during troubleshooting.
Ok, but the option shouldn't be used to "solve" the problem.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
The only real use for command line options is to be able to get users to test
something during troubleshooting.
Greg KH wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:05:41PM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> Some EFI BIOS stores BGRT data in the wrong place and some EFI based
>> BIOS also requires mapping
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:05:41PM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> Some EFI BIOS stores BGRT data in the wrong place and some EFI based
> BIOS also requires mapping of boot code/data when doing
> efi_enter_virtual_mode.
>
> Current code in efi_enter_virtual_mode maps both EFI_RUNTIME_MEMORY and
>
Some EFI BIOS stores BGRT data in the wrong place and some EFI based
BIOS also requires mapping of boot code/data when doing
efi_enter_virtual_mode.
Current code in efi_enter_virtual_mode maps both EFI_RUNTIME_MEMORY and
BIOS boot code/data.
This patch gives the option to switch off that behavior
6 matches
Mail list logo
