On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 09:46 -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 20:58 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> >
> > Please add a comment here that says something like:
> >
> > /*
> > * Don't bother moving it if the destination CPU is
> > * not running a
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 09:46 -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 20:58 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
Please add a comment here that says something like:
/*
* Don't bother moving it if the destination CPU is
* not running a lower
On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 20:58 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> Please add a comment here that says something like:
>
> /*
>* Don't bother moving it if the destination CPU is
>* not running a lower priority task.
>*/
>
Okay. Updated
On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 20:58 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
Please add a comment here that says something like:
/*
* Don't bother moving it if the destination CPU is
* not running a lower priority task.
*/
Okay. Updated in patch
On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 11:01:51 -0800
Tim Chen wrote:
> Didn't get any response for this patch probably due to the holidays.
> Reposting it as we will like to get it merged to help our database
> workload.
>
> This patch added checks that prevent futile attempts to move rt tasks
> to cpu with
On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 20:30 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 11:01:51AM -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> > Didn't get any response for this patch probably due to the holidays.
> > Reposting it as we will like to get it merged to help our database
> > workload.
> >
> > This patch
On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 20:30 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 11:01:51AM -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
Didn't get any response for this patch probably due to the holidays.
Reposting it as we will like to get it merged to help our database
workload.
This patch added checks
On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 11:01:51 -0800
Tim Chen tim.c.c...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Didn't get any response for this patch probably due to the holidays.
Reposting it as we will like to get it merged to help our database
workload.
This patch added checks that prevent futile attempts to move rt
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 11:01:51AM -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> Didn't get any response for this patch probably due to the holidays.
> Reposting it as we will like to get it merged to help our database
> workload.
>
> This patch added checks that prevent futile attempts to move rt tasks
> to cpu with
Didn't get any response for this patch probably due to the holidays.
Reposting it as we will like to get it merged to help our database
workload.
This patch added checks that prevent futile attempts to move rt tasks
to cpu with active tasks of equal or higher priority. This reduces
run queue
Didn't get any response for this patch probably due to the holidays.
Reposting it as we will like to get it merged to help our database
workload.
This patch added checks that prevent futile attempts to move rt tasks
to cpu with active tasks of equal or higher priority. This reduces
run queue
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 11:01:51AM -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
Didn't get any response for this patch probably due to the holidays.
Reposting it as we will like to get it merged to help our database
workload.
This patch added checks that prevent futile attempts to move rt tasks
to cpu with
12 matches
Mail list logo