On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 02:06:18PM +0100, Charles-Edouard Ruault wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
> >On Llu, 2005-02-07 at 09:29, Charles-Edouard Ruault wrote:
> >>- Why is the generic timer using this address ? isn't it reserving a too
> >>wide portion of IO ports ? Should it be modified for this board
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 02:06:18PM +0100, Charles-Edouard Ruault wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
On Llu, 2005-02-07 at 09:29, Charles-Edouard Ruault wrote:
- Why is the generic timer using this address ? isn't it reserving a too
wide portion of IO ports ? Should it be modified for this board ?
It
Alan Cox wrote:
On Llu, 2005-02-07 at 09:29, Charles-Edouard Ruault wrote:
- Why is the generic timer using this address ? isn't it reserving a too
wide portion of IO ports ? Should it be modified for this board ?
It just reserved the entire chip space since way back when.
- If
Alan Cox wrote:
On Llu, 2005-02-07 at 09:29, Charles-Edouard Ruault wrote:
- Why is the generic timer using this address ? isn't it reserving a too
wide portion of IO ports ? Should it be modified for this board ?
It just reserved the entire chip space since way back when.
- If
4 matches
Mail list logo