On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Roland McGrath wrote:
> As I said in some earlier discussion following my original patch, that
> would be fine with me. I haven't coded up that variant, but it's simple
> enough. Would you like to do it?
Sure.
--
James Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> > This patch makes do_wait return -EPERM instead of -ECHILD if some
> > children were ruled out solely because security_task_wait failed.
>
> What about using the return value from the security_task_wait hook (which
> should be -EACCES) ?
As I
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Roland McGrath wrote:
> This patch makes do_wait return -EPERM instead of -ECHILD if some
> children were ruled out solely because security_task_wait failed.
What about using the return value from the security_task_wait hook (which
should be -EACCES) ?
- James
--
James
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Roland McGrath wrote:
This patch makes do_wait return -EPERM instead of -ECHILD if some
children were ruled out solely because security_task_wait failed.
What about using the return value from the security_task_wait hook (which
should be -EACCES) ?
- James
--
James
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Roland McGrath wrote:
This patch makes do_wait return -EPERM instead of -ECHILD if some
children were ruled out solely because security_task_wait failed.
What about using the return value from the security_task_wait hook (which
should be -EACCES) ?
As I said in
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Roland McGrath wrote:
As I said in some earlier discussion following my original patch, that
would be fine with me. I haven't coded up that variant, but it's simple
enough. Would you like to do it?
Sure.
--
James Morris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this
wait* syscalls return -ECHILD even when an individual PID of a live
child was requested explicitly, when security_task_wait denies the
operation. This means that something like a broken SELinux policy
can produce an unexpected failure that looks just like a bug with
wait or ptrace or something.
wait* syscalls return -ECHILD even when an individual PID of a live
child was requested explicitly, when security_task_wait denies the
operation. This means that something like a broken SELinux policy
can produce an unexpected failure that looks just like a bug with
wait or ptrace or something.
8 matches
Mail list logo