On 11/9/20 2:29 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 03:10:06PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 08:27:44PM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>>> Hi Stable Team,
>>>
>>> On 10/19/20 7:19 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
This reverts commit 00fdec98d9881bf5173af09a
On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 03:10:06PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 08:27:44PM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > Hi Stable Team,
> >
> > On 10/19/20 7:19 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > > This reverts commit 00fdec98d9881bf5173af09aebd353ab3b9ac729.
> > > (but only from 5.2 and
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 08:27:44PM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> Hi Stable Team,
>
> On 10/19/20 7:19 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > This reverts commit 00fdec98d9881bf5173af09aebd353ab3b9ac729.
> > (but only from 5.2 and prior kernels)
> >
> > The original commit was a preventive fix based on code-r
Hi Stable Team,
On 10/19/20 7:19 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> This reverts commit 00fdec98d9881bf5173af09aebd353ab3b9ac729.
> (but only from 5.2 and prior kernels)
>
> The original commit was a preventive fix based on code-review and was
> auto-picked for stable back-port (for better or worse).
> It
This reverts commit 00fdec98d9881bf5173af09aebd353ab3b9ac729.
(but only from 5.2 and prior kernels)
The original commit was a preventive fix based on code-review and was
auto-picked for stable back-port (for better or worse).
It was OK for v5.3+ kernels, but turned up needing an implicit change
68
5 matches
Mail list logo
