Viktor Jägersküpper writes:
> Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Viktor Jägersküpper writes:
>>
>>> Kalle Valo writes:
Roman Mamedov writes:
> On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 12:18:38 +0800
> Qiujun Huang wrote:
>
>> In ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb interface number is assumed to be 0.
>> usb_ifnum
Kalle Valo wrote:
> Viktor Jägersküpper writes:
>
>> Kalle Valo writes:
>>> Roman Mamedov writes:
>>>
On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 12:18:38 +0800
Qiujun Huang wrote:
> In ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb interface number is assumed to be 0.
> usb_ifnum_to_if(urb->dev, 0)
> But it isn't alw
Viktor Jägersküpper writes:
> Kalle Valo writes:
>> Roman Mamedov writes:
>>
>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 12:18:38 +0800
>>> Qiujun Huang wrote:
>>>
In ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb interface number is assumed to be 0.
usb_ifnum_to_if(urb->dev, 0)
But it isn't always true.
The case r
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 17:53:27 +0200
Viktor Jägersküpper wrote:
> Kalle Valo writes:
> > Roman Mamedov writes:
> >
> >> On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 12:18:38 +0800
> >> Qiujun Huang wrote:
> >>
> >>> In ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb interface number is assumed to be 0.
> >>> usb_ifnum_to_if(urb->dev, 0)
> >>> But i
Kalle Valo writes:
> Roman Mamedov writes:
>
>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 12:18:38 +0800
>> Qiujun Huang wrote:
>>
>>> In ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb interface number is assumed to be 0.
>>> usb_ifnum_to_if(urb->dev, 0)
>>> But it isn't always true.
>>>
>>> The case reported by syzbot:
>>> https://lore.kernel
5 matches
Mail list logo