Re: [PATCH] Revert "bridge: only expire the mdb entry when query is received"

2013-10-22 Thread David Miller
From: Linus Lüssing Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 00:58:57 +0200 > While this commit was a good attempt to fix issues occuring when no > multicast querier is present, this commit still has two more issues: > > 1) There are cases where mdb entries do not expire even if there is a > querier present. The

Re: [PATCH] Revert "bridge: only expire the mdb entry when query is received"

2013-10-22 Thread Vlad Yasevich
On 10/21/2013 06:45 PM, David Miller wrote: From: Linus Lüssing Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 00:58:57 +0200 While this commit was a good attempt to fix issues occuring when no multicast querier is present, this commit still has two more issues: 1) There are cases where mdb entries do not expire eve

Re: [PATCH] Revert "bridge: only expire the mdb entry when query is received"

2013-10-21 Thread Cong Wang
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Linus Lüssing wrote: > While this commit was a good attempt to fix issues occuring when no > multicast querier is present, this commit still has two more issues: > > 1) There are cases where mdb entries do not expire even if there is a > querier present. The bridge

Re: [PATCH] Revert "bridge: only expire the mdb entry when query is received"

2013-10-21 Thread David Miller
From: Linus Lüssing Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 00:58:57 +0200 > While this commit was a good attempt to fix issues occuring when no > multicast querier is present, this commit still has two more issues: > > 1) There are cases where mdb entries do not expire even if there is a > querier present. The

[PATCH] Revert "bridge: only expire the mdb entry when query is received"

2013-10-19 Thread Linus Lüssing
While this commit was a good attempt to fix issues occuring when no multicast querier is present, this commit still has two more issues: 1) There are cases where mdb entries do not expire even if there is a querier present. The bridge will unnecessarily continue flooding multicast packets on the a