On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 05:50:58PM -0400, Frank Mori Hess wrote:
> This reverts commit 88987d2c7534a0269f567fb101e6d71a08f0f01d.
>
> The pl330.c pause implementation violates the dmaengine requirement
> for no data loss, since it relies on the DMAKILL
> instruction. However, DMAKILL discards in-f
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 10:37:09AM -0400, Frank Mori Hess wrote:
> On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 12:32 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 05:50:58PM -0400, Frank Mori Hess wrote:
> >> This reverts commit 88987d2c7534a0269f567fb101e6d71a08f0f01d.
> >>
> >
> > I am dropping the orignal patch
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 12:32 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 05:50:58PM -0400, Frank Mori Hess wrote:
>> This reverts commit 88987d2c7534a0269f567fb101e6d71a08f0f01d.
>>
>
> I am dropping the orignal patch for queue, so no need for revert patch.
>
I don't understand, 88987d2c7534a
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 05:50:58PM -0400, Frank Mori Hess wrote:
> This reverts commit 88987d2c7534a0269f567fb101e6d71a08f0f01d.
>
> The pl330.c pause implementation violates the dmaengine requirement
> for no data loss, since it relies on the DMAKILL
> instruction. However, DMAKILL discards in-f
This reverts commit 88987d2c7534a0269f567fb101e6d71a08f0f01d.
The pl330.c pause implementation violates the dmaengine requirement
for no data loss, since it relies on the DMAKILL
instruction. However, DMAKILL discards in-flight data from the
dma controller's fifo. This is documented in the dma-3
5 matches
Mail list logo