On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 12:31 -0700, Elliot Berman wrote:
> On 5/11/2020 11:54 AM, Joe Perches wrote> Change-Id: probably isn't necessary.
>
> Thanks for the catch
>
> > Is there a separate mechanism possible to avoid bloating the
> > otherwise unused content?
>
> This struct is being used in lib/
On 5/11/2020 11:54 AM, Joe Perches wrote> Change-Id: probably isn't necessary.
Thanks for the catch
>
> Is there a separate mechanism possible to avoid bloating the
> otherwise unused content?
This struct is being used in lib/dynamic_debug.c but compiler doesn't know
about this usage when optim
On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 11:26 -0700, Elliot Berman wrote:
> This reverts commit c0d2af637863940b1a4fb208224ca7acb905c39f.
>
> Some compilers[1] may break dynamic_hex_dump by optimizing the
> DYNAMIC_DEBUG_BRANCH check inside __dynamic_func_call_no_desc and completely
> removing the dynamic debug met
This reverts commit c0d2af637863940b1a4fb208224ca7acb905c39f.
Some compilers[1] may break dynamic_hex_dump by optimizing the
DYNAMIC_DEBUG_BRANCH check inside __dynamic_func_call_no_desc and completely
removing the dynamic debug metadata. Thus, there is no dynamic_debug control
site to enable or d
4 matches
Mail list logo