On 05/30, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2020/5/30 9:49, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 05/30, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> On 2020/5/30 6:34, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>> On 05/29, Chao Yu wrote:
> Under heavy fsstress, we may triggle panic while issuing discard,
> because __check_sit_bitmap() detects that discard c
On 2020/5/30 9:49, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 05/30, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2020/5/30 6:34, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 05/29, Chao Yu wrote:
Under heavy fsstress, we may triggle panic while issuing discard,
because __check_sit_bitmap() detects that discard command may earse
valid data bloc
On 05/30, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2020/5/30 6:34, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 05/29, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> Under heavy fsstress, we may triggle panic while issuing discard,
> >> because __check_sit_bitmap() detects that discard command may earse
> >> valid data blocks, the root cause is as below race stack
On 2020/5/30 6:34, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 05/29, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Under heavy fsstress, we may triggle panic while issuing discard,
>> because __check_sit_bitmap() detects that discard command may earse
>> valid data blocks, the root cause is as below race stack described,
>> since we removed loc
On 05/29, Chao Yu wrote:
> Under heavy fsstress, we may triggle panic while issuing discard,
> because __check_sit_bitmap() detects that discard command may earse
> valid data blocks, the root cause is as below race stack described,
> since we removed lock when flushing quota data, quota data write
Under heavy fsstress, we may triggle panic while issuing discard,
because __check_sit_bitmap() detects that discard command may earse
valid data blocks, the root cause is as below race stack described,
since we removed lock when flushing quota data, quota data writeback
may race with write_checkpoi
6 matches
Mail list logo