Re: [PATCH] Revert "serial: omap: fix software flow control"

2012-11-21 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:56:59AM +0100, Andreas Bießmann wrote: > On 16.10.2012 16:09, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > This reverts commit 957ee7270d632245b43f6feb0e70d9a5e9ea6cf6 > > (serial: omap: fix software flow control). > > > > As Russell has pointed out, that commit isn't fixing > > Software

Re: [PATCH] Revert serial: omap: fix software flow control

2012-11-21 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:56:59AM +0100, Andreas Bießmann wrote: On 16.10.2012 16:09, Felipe Balbi wrote: This reverts commit 957ee7270d632245b43f6feb0e70d9a5e9ea6cf6 (serial: omap: fix software flow control). As Russell has pointed out, that commit isn't fixing Software Flow Control

Re: [PATCH] Revert "serial: omap: fix software flow control"

2012-11-07 Thread Andreas Bießmann
On 16.10.2012 16:09, Felipe Balbi wrote: > This reverts commit 957ee7270d632245b43f6feb0e70d9a5e9ea6cf6 > (serial: omap: fix software flow control). > > As Russell has pointed out, that commit isn't fixing > Software Flow Control at all, and it actually makes > it even more broken. > > It was

Re: [PATCH] Revert serial: omap: fix software flow control

2012-11-07 Thread Andreas Bießmann
On 16.10.2012 16:09, Felipe Balbi wrote: This reverts commit 957ee7270d632245b43f6feb0e70d9a5e9ea6cf6 (serial: omap: fix software flow control). As Russell has pointed out, that commit isn't fixing Software Flow Control at all, and it actually makes it even more broken. It was agreed to

Re: [PATCH] Revert "serial: omap: fix software flow control"

2012-10-24 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:57:42AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 01:02:55PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 08:13:59AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Felipe Balbi [121016 07:16]: > > > > This reverts commit

Re: [PATCH] Revert "serial: omap: fix software flow control"

2012-10-24 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 01:02:55PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 08:13:59AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Felipe Balbi [121016 07:16]: > > > This reverts commit 957ee7270d632245b43f6feb0e70d9a5e9ea6cf6 > > > (serial: omap: fix software flow control). > > >

Re: [PATCH] Revert "serial: omap: fix software flow control"

2012-10-24 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi Greg, On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 08:13:59AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Felipe Balbi [121016 07:16]: > > This reverts commit 957ee7270d632245b43f6feb0e70d9a5e9ea6cf6 > > (serial: omap: fix software flow control). > > > > As Russell has pointed out, that commit isn't fixing > > Software Flow

Re: [PATCH] Revert serial: omap: fix software flow control

2012-10-24 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi Greg, On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 08:13:59AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: * Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com [121016 07:16]: This reverts commit 957ee7270d632245b43f6feb0e70d9a5e9ea6cf6 (serial: omap: fix software flow control). As Russell has pointed out, that commit isn't fixing Software

Re: [PATCH] Revert serial: omap: fix software flow control

2012-10-24 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 01:02:55PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: Hi Greg, On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 08:13:59AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: * Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com [121016 07:16]: This reverts commit 957ee7270d632245b43f6feb0e70d9a5e9ea6cf6 (serial: omap: fix software flow control).

Re: [PATCH] Revert serial: omap: fix software flow control

2012-10-24 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:57:42AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 01:02:55PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: Hi Greg, On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 08:13:59AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: * Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com [121016 07:16]: This reverts commit

Re: [PATCH] Revert "serial: omap: fix software flow control"

2012-10-16 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Felipe Balbi [121016 07:16]: > This reverts commit 957ee7270d632245b43f6feb0e70d9a5e9ea6cf6 > (serial: omap: fix software flow control). > > As Russell has pointed out, that commit isn't fixing > Software Flow Control at all, and it actually makes > it even more broken. > > It was agreed to

[PATCH] Revert "serial: omap: fix software flow control"

2012-10-16 Thread Felipe Balbi
This reverts commit 957ee7270d632245b43f6feb0e70d9a5e9ea6cf6 (serial: omap: fix software flow control). As Russell has pointed out, that commit isn't fixing Software Flow Control at all, and it actually makes it even more broken. It was agreed to revert this commit and use Russell's latest UART

[PATCH] Revert serial: omap: fix software flow control

2012-10-16 Thread Felipe Balbi
This reverts commit 957ee7270d632245b43f6feb0e70d9a5e9ea6cf6 (serial: omap: fix software flow control). As Russell has pointed out, that commit isn't fixing Software Flow Control at all, and it actually makes it even more broken. It was agreed to revert this commit and use Russell's latest UART

Re: [PATCH] Revert serial: omap: fix software flow control

2012-10-16 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com [121016 07:16]: This reverts commit 957ee7270d632245b43f6feb0e70d9a5e9ea6cf6 (serial: omap: fix software flow control). As Russell has pointed out, that commit isn't fixing Software Flow Control at all, and it actually makes it even more broken. It was agreed