On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 11:41:40AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 11:53:42PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Removing IFX0102 from tpm_tis was not a right move because both tpm_tis
> > and tpm_infineon use the same device ID. Revert the commit and add a
> > remark
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 11:53:42PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Removing IFX0102 from tpm_tis was not a right move because both tpm_tis
> and tpm_infineon use the same device ID. Revert the commit and add a
> remark about a bug caused by commit 93e1b7d42e1e ("[PATCH] tpm: add HID
> module
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 02:47:07PM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
>
> Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2020-07-06 13:53 MST:
>
> > Removing IFX0102 from tpm_tis was not a right move because both tpm_tis
> > and tpm_infineon use the same device ID. Revert the commit and add a
> > remark about a bug caused by
Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2020-07-06 13:53 MST:
> Removing IFX0102 from tpm_tis was not a right move because both tpm_tis
> and tpm_infineon use the same device ID. Revert the commit and add a
> remark about a bug caused by commit 93e1b7d42e1e ("[PATCH] tpm: add HID
> module parameter").
>
> Fixes:
Removing IFX0102 from tpm_tis was not a right move because both tpm_tis
and tpm_infineon use the same device ID. Revert the commit and add a
remark about a bug caused by commit 93e1b7d42e1e ("[PATCH] tpm: add HID
module parameter").
Fixes: e918e570415c ("tpm_tis: Remove the HID IFX0102")
5 matches
Mail list logo