Re: [PATCH] Revert lazy irq disable for simple irqs

2007-12-13 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [This patch *is* for mainline Linux] > > > > In commit 76d2160147f43f982dfe881404cfde9fd0a9da21 lazy irq disabling > > was implemented, and the simple irq handler had a masking set to it. > > thanks, ap

Re: [PATCH] Revert lazy irq disable for simple irqs

2007-12-13 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hello Steven, > In commit 76d2160147f43f982dfe881404cfde9fd0a9da21 lazy irq disabling > was implemented, and the simple irq handler had a masking set to it. > > Remy Bohmer discovered that some devices in the ARM architecture > would trigger the mask, but never unmask it. His patch to do the > unm

Re: [PATCH] Revert lazy irq disable for simple irqs

2007-12-13 Thread Russell King
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 03:20:10PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > [This patch *is* for mainline Linux] > > In commit 76d2160147f43f982dfe881404cfde9fd0a9da21 lazy irq disabling > was implemented, and the simple irq handler had a masking set to it. > > Remy Bohmer discovered that some devices i

Re: [PATCH] Revert lazy irq disable for simple irqs

2007-12-13 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [This patch *is* for mainline Linux] > > In commit 76d2160147f43f982dfe881404cfde9fd0a9da21 lazy irq disabling > was implemented, and the simple irq handler had a masking set to it. > > Remy Bohmer discovered that some devices in the ARM architectu

[PATCH] Revert lazy irq disable for simple irqs

2007-12-12 Thread Steven Rostedt
[This patch *is* for mainline Linux] In commit 76d2160147f43f982dfe881404cfde9fd0a9da21 lazy irq disabling was implemented, and the simple irq handler had a masking set to it. Remy Bohmer discovered that some devices in the ARM architecture would trigger the mask, but never unmask it. His patch