On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:56:59AM +0100, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> On 16.10.2012 16:09, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > This reverts commit 957ee7270d632245b43f6feb0e70d9a5e9ea6cf6
> > (serial: omap: fix software flow control).
> >
> > As Russell has pointed out, that commit isn't fixing
> > Software
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:56:59AM +0100, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
On 16.10.2012 16:09, Felipe Balbi wrote:
This reverts commit 957ee7270d632245b43f6feb0e70d9a5e9ea6cf6
(serial: omap: fix software flow control).
As Russell has pointed out, that commit isn't fixing
Software Flow Control
On 16.10.2012 16:09, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> This reverts commit 957ee7270d632245b43f6feb0e70d9a5e9ea6cf6
> (serial: omap: fix software flow control).
>
> As Russell has pointed out, that commit isn't fixing
> Software Flow Control at all, and it actually makes
> it even more broken.
>
> It was
On 16.10.2012 16:09, Felipe Balbi wrote:
This reverts commit 957ee7270d632245b43f6feb0e70d9a5e9ea6cf6
(serial: omap: fix software flow control).
As Russell has pointed out, that commit isn't fixing
Software Flow Control at all, and it actually makes
it even more broken.
It was agreed to
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:57:42AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 01:02:55PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 08:13:59AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > * Felipe Balbi [121016 07:16]:
> > > > This reverts commit
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 01:02:55PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 08:13:59AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Felipe Balbi [121016 07:16]:
> > > This reverts commit 957ee7270d632245b43f6feb0e70d9a5e9ea6cf6
> > > (serial: omap: fix software flow control).
> > >
Hi Greg,
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 08:13:59AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Felipe Balbi [121016 07:16]:
> > This reverts commit 957ee7270d632245b43f6feb0e70d9a5e9ea6cf6
> > (serial: omap: fix software flow control).
> >
> > As Russell has pointed out, that commit isn't fixing
> > Software Flow
Hi Greg,
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 08:13:59AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com [121016 07:16]:
This reverts commit 957ee7270d632245b43f6feb0e70d9a5e9ea6cf6
(serial: omap: fix software flow control).
As Russell has pointed out, that commit isn't fixing
Software
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 01:02:55PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 08:13:59AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com [121016 07:16]:
This reverts commit 957ee7270d632245b43f6feb0e70d9a5e9ea6cf6
(serial: omap: fix software flow control).
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:57:42AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 01:02:55PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 08:13:59AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com [121016 07:16]:
This reverts commit
* Felipe Balbi [121016 07:16]:
> This reverts commit 957ee7270d632245b43f6feb0e70d9a5e9ea6cf6
> (serial: omap: fix software flow control).
>
> As Russell has pointed out, that commit isn't fixing
> Software Flow Control at all, and it actually makes
> it even more broken.
>
> It was agreed to
This reverts commit 957ee7270d632245b43f6feb0e70d9a5e9ea6cf6
(serial: omap: fix software flow control).
As Russell has pointed out, that commit isn't fixing
Software Flow Control at all, and it actually makes
it even more broken.
It was agreed to revert this commit and use Russell's
latest UART
This reverts commit 957ee7270d632245b43f6feb0e70d9a5e9ea6cf6
(serial: omap: fix software flow control).
As Russell has pointed out, that commit isn't fixing
Software Flow Control at all, and it actually makes
it even more broken.
It was agreed to revert this commit and use Russell's
latest UART
* Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com [121016 07:16]:
This reverts commit 957ee7270d632245b43f6feb0e70d9a5e9ea6cf6
(serial: omap: fix software flow control).
As Russell has pointed out, that commit isn't fixing
Software Flow Control at all, and it actually makes
it even more broken.
It was agreed
14 matches
Mail list logo