On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 04:16:48PM -0400, Bob Bell wrote:
> I've been testing this patch on my systems. It's working for me when
> I read() a file. Asynchronous write()s seem okay, too. However,
> synchronous writes (caused by either calling fsync() or fcntl() to
> release a lock) prevent the
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 04:16:48PM -0400, Bob Bell wrote:
I've been testing this patch on my systems. It's working for me when
I read() a file. Asynchronous write()s seem okay, too. However,
synchronous writes (caused by either calling fsync() or fcntl() to
release a lock) prevent the
On Wednesday 26 September 2007 21:57, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> Bob Bell wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 08:43:49PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >> Here's the second version of TASK_KILLABLE. A few changes since
> >> version 1:
> >
> >
> >
> >> I obviously haven't covered every place that can
On Wednesday 26 September 2007 21:57, Ric Wheeler wrote:
Bob Bell wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 08:43:49PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
Here's the second version of TASK_KILLABLE. A few changes since
version 1:
snip
I obviously haven't covered every place that can result in a
Bob Bell wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 08:43:49PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
Here's the second version of TASK_KILLABLE. A few changes since
version 1:
I obviously haven't covered every place that can result in a process
sleeping uninterruptibly while attempting an operation. But
Bob Bell wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 08:43:49PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
Here's the second version of TASK_KILLABLE. A few changes since
version 1:
snip
I obviously haven't covered every place that can result in a process
sleeping uninterruptibly while attempting an operation. But
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 08:43:49PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
Here's the second version of TASK_KILLABLE. A few changes since version 1:
I obviously haven't covered every place that can result in a process
sleeping uninterruptibly while attempting an operation. But sync_page
(patch 4/5)
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 08:43:49PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
Here's the second version of TASK_KILLABLE. A few changes since version 1:
snip
I obviously haven't covered every place that can result in a process
sleeping uninterruptibly while attempting an operation. But sync_page
(patch
Here's the second version of TASK_KILLABLE. A few changes since version 1:
- Don't split up TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE and TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE.
TASK_WAKESIGNAL and TASK_LOADAVG were pretty much equivalent, and since
we had to keep __TASK_{UN,}INTERRUPTIBLE anyway, splitting them made
little
Here's the second version of TASK_KILLABLE. A few changes since version 1:
- Don't split up TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE and TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE.
TASK_WAKESIGNAL and TASK_LOADAVG were pretty much equivalent, and since
we had to keep __TASK_{UN,}INTERRUPTIBLE anyway, splitting them made
little
10 matches
Mail list logo