On Thu 06-09-12 11:08:11, Ian Abbott wrote:
> My recent patch to add DIRECT_IO support to the UDF filesystem handler
> contains a mistake in the error recovery if blockdev_direct_IO() fails.
> The test `rw && WRITE` should be `rw & WRITE`. Fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Abbott
Thanks. I've
My recent patch to add DIRECT_IO support to the UDF filesystem handler
contains a mistake in the error recovery if blockdev_direct_IO() fails.
The test `rw && WRITE` should be `rw & WRITE`. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Ian Abbott
---
fs/udf/inode.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
My recent patch to add DIRECT_IO support to the UDF filesystem handler
contains a mistake in the error recovery if blockdev_direct_IO() fails.
The test `rw WRITE` should be `rw WRITE`. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Ian Abbott abbo...@mev.co.uk
---
fs/udf/inode.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1
On Thu 06-09-12 11:08:11, Ian Abbott wrote:
My recent patch to add DIRECT_IO support to the UDF filesystem handler
contains a mistake in the error recovery if blockdev_direct_IO() fails.
The test `rw WRITE` should be `rw WRITE`. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Ian Abbott abbo...@mev.co.uk
4 matches
Mail list logo