On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 11:26:34AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Doesn't this assume that the arch is only ever uniprocessor, which I
> don't think is true on i386 UML??
It is for now, and when that changes, I haven't decided if and when
interrupts will be received on multiple CPUs.
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:43:14 -0400 Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Add _irqsave/_irqrestore to the locking in update_drop_skb to keep
> uml_net_rx out while the drop skb is being messed with.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> arch/um/drivers/net_kern.c |5 +++--
Add _irqsave/_irqrestore to the locking in update_drop_skb to keep
uml_net_rx out while the drop skb is being messed with.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/um/drivers/net_kern.c |5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index:
Add _irqsave/_irqrestore to the locking in update_drop_skb to keep
uml_net_rx out while the drop skb is being messed with.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/um/drivers/net_kern.c |5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:43:14 -0400 Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add _irqsave/_irqrestore to the locking in update_drop_skb to keep
uml_net_rx out while the drop skb is being messed with.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/um/drivers/net_kern.c |5 +++--
1 file
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 11:26:34AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Doesn't this assume that the arch is only ever uniprocessor, which I
don't think is true on i386 UML??
It is for now, and when that changes, I haven't decided if and when
interrupts will be received on multiple CPUs.
6 matches
Mail list logo