Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML - time build fix

2007-09-26 Thread Paolo Giarrusso
On mercoledì 26 settembre 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Jeff, > > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 17:56 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:54:15PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 13:37 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > > > > Put back an implementation of timeval_to_ns

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML - time build fix

2007-09-26 Thread Paolo Giarrusso
On mercoledì 26 settembre 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote: Jeff, On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 17:56 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:54:15PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 13:37 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: Put back an implementation of timeval_to_ns in

Re: [PATCH] UML - time build fix

2007-09-25 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Jeff, On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 17:56 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:54:15PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 13:37 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > > > Put back an implementation of timeval_to_ns in > > > arch/um/os-Linux/time.c. tglx pointed out in his review

Re: [PATCH] UML - time build fix

2007-09-25 Thread Jeff Dike
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:54:15PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 13:37 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > > Put back an implementation of timeval_to_ns in > > arch/um/os-Linux/time.c. tglx pointed out in his review of tickless > > support that there was a perfectly good

Re: [PATCH] UML - time build fix

2007-09-25 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 13:37 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > Put back an implementation of timeval_to_ns in > arch/um/os-Linux/time.c. tglx pointed out in his review of tickless > support that there was a perfectly good implementation of it in > linux/time.h. The problem is that this is userspace code

[PATCH] UML - time build fix

2007-09-25 Thread Jeff Dike
Put back an implementation of timeval_to_ns in arch/um/os-Linux/time.c. tglx pointed out in his review of tickless support that there was a perfectly good implementation of it in linux/time.h. The problem is that this is userspace code which can't pull in kernel headers and there doesn't seem to

[PATCH] UML - time build fix

2007-09-25 Thread Jeff Dike
Put back an implementation of timeval_to_ns in arch/um/os-Linux/time.c. tglx pointed out in his review of tickless support that there was a perfectly good implementation of it in linux/time.h. The problem is that this is userspace code which can't pull in kernel headers and there doesn't seem to

Re: [PATCH] UML - time build fix

2007-09-25 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 13:37 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: Put back an implementation of timeval_to_ns in arch/um/os-Linux/time.c. tglx pointed out in his review of tickless support that there was a perfectly good implementation of it in linux/time.h. The problem is that this is userspace code

Re: [PATCH] UML - time build fix

2007-09-25 Thread Jeff Dike
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:54:15PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 13:37 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: Put back an implementation of timeval_to_ns in arch/um/os-Linux/time.c. tglx pointed out in his review of tickless support that there was a perfectly good implementation of

Re: [PATCH] UML - time build fix

2007-09-25 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Jeff, On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 17:56 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:54:15PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 13:37 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: Put back an implementation of timeval_to_ns in arch/um/os-Linux/time.c. tglx pointed out in his review of