> Did I send the right patch? The one I meant to send (appended below),
> indeed builds and runs without utrace-regset.patch and
> utrace-core.patch applied. It's utrace-1 in the following:
That is not the same patch I tried before. This one does apply and build
fine (after make defconfig ARCH=
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:01:59AM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Below is a tracehook patch for UML which goes right after
> > utrace-utrace-tracehook.patch.
>
> It does not. That patch has regset and ptrace stuff in it. It indeed
> applies fine before or after utrace patches. But it doesn't
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 07:19:03PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Your replacement patch still has utrace_regset stuff in it, so it doesn't
> > compile without the later patches in the series. Try applying only
> > utrace-tracehook.patch from the series, then get it to build and make your
> >
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 07:19:03PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Your replacement patch still has utrace_regset stuff in it, so it doesn't
> compile without the later patches in the series. Try applying only
> utrace-tracehook.patch from the series, then get it to build and make your
> utrace-tra
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 07:19:03PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Your replacement patch still has utrace_regset stuff in it, so it doesn't
> compile without the later patches in the series. Try applying only
> utrace-tracehook.patch from the series, then get it to build and make your
> utrace-tra
> OK, I'll do it this way.
Your replacement patch still has utrace_regset stuff in it, so it doesn't
compile without the later patches in the series. Try applying only
utrace-tracehook.patch from the series, then get it to build and make your
utrace-tracehook-um.patch. Then apply only utrace-reg
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 03:12:28AM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> The way I've organized my patch series is with the arch support split up
> along with the separate infrastructure patches in the series. That is,
> just asm/tracehook.h with no utrace_regset stuff in the first patch so that
> the ke
> Below is the first step in your Fix-Your-Broken-Arch-HOWTO for UML.
Great! Thanks for tackling this.
> Do you want incremental patches as I go along, or replacement ones?
The way I've organized my patch series is with the arch support split up
along with the separate infrastructure patches in
Below is the first step in your Fix-Your-Broken-Arch-HOWTO for UML.
Do you want incremental patches as I go along, or replacement ones?
BTW, UML runs on the utrace in -mm (i.e. utrace on the host), which it
didn't with several Fedora kernels.
Jeff
--
Work email
9 matches
Mail list logo
