On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 01:36:00PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:32:34PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> > >
> > > Your proposal is to strike the "is_b_host" check. In terms of the
> > > OTG (1.3) state machine,
On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:32:34PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> >
> > Your proposal is to strike the "is_b_host" check. In terms of the
> > OTG (1.3) state machine, that removes a b_host --> b_peripheral
> > state transition.
>
> Not at
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:32:34PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> > > > > > Some devices claim
> > > > > > to be b_host even though they have an a_connector attached to it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Why not just fix that bug? Remember that's Linux code.
> > > >
> > > > The device claiming to be
On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:32:34PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
Your proposal is to strike the is_b_host check. In terms of the
OTG (1.3) state machine, that removes a b_host -- b_peripheral
state transition.
Not at all, we're just
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 01:36:00PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:32:34PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
Your proposal is to strike the is_b_host check. In terms of the
OTG (1.3) state machine, that removes a
> > > > > Some devices claim
> > > > > to be b_host even though they have an a_connector attached to it.
> > > >
> > > > Why not just fix that bug? Remember that's Linux code.
> > >
> > > The device claiming to be b_host is not linux based.
> >
> > Wrong ... the meaning of that flag is:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 05:02:47AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 02:28:53AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > Some devices claim
> > > > to be b_host even though
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 02:28:53AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> > On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > Some devices claim
> > > to be b_host even though they have an a_connector attached to it.
> >
> > Why not just fix that
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 02:28:53AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Some devices claim
> > to be b_host even though they have an a_connector attached to it.
>
> Why not just fix that bug? Remember that's Linux code.
The device claiming to be
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Some devices claim
> to be b_host even though they have an a_connector attached to it.
Why not just fix that bug? Remember that's Linux code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Remove the check for is_b_host upon enumerating otg devices as it
can trigger some weird behaviors on otg sessions. Some devices claim
to be b_host even though they have an a_connector attached to it.
Checking b_hnp_enable flag should be secure enough or terms of
otg compliancy.
Signed-off-by:
Remove the check for is_b_host upon enumerating otg devices as it
can trigger some weird behaviors on otg sessions. Some devices claim
to be b_host even though they have an a_connector attached to it.
Checking b_hnp_enable flag should be secure enough or terms of
otg compliancy.
Signed-off-by:
Some devices claim
to be b_host even though they have an a_connector attached to it.
Why not just fix that bug? Remember that's Linux code.
The device claiming to be b_host is not linux based.
Wrong ... the meaning of that flag is: *THIS* system is a
Linux-USB
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 05:02:47AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 02:28:53AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Some devices claim
to be b_host even though they have an
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 02:28:53AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Some devices claim
to be b_host even though they have an a_connector attached to it.
Why not just fix that bug? Remember
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 02:28:53AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Some devices claim
to be b_host even though they have an a_connector attached to it.
Why not just fix that bug? Remember that's Linux code.
The device claiming to be b_host is
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Some devices claim
to be b_host even though they have an a_connector attached to it.
Why not just fix that bug? Remember that's Linux code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to
17 matches
Mail list logo
