On 2/24/2016 8:04 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 3:15 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> On 2/15/2016 7:26 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
A crash has been observed when
On 2/24/2016 8:04 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 3:15 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> On 2/15/2016 7:26 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
A crash has been observed when assigning penalty on x86 systems.
It
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 3:15 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 2/15/2016 7:26 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>>> A crash has been observed when assigning penalty on x86 systems.
>>>
>>> It looks like
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 3:15 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 2/15/2016 7:26 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>>> A crash has been observed when assigning penalty on x86 systems.
>>>
>>> It looks like this problem happens on x86 platforms with
On 2/15/2016 7:26 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> A crash has been observed when assigning penalty on x86 systems.
>>
>> It looks like this problem happens on x86 platforms with IOAPIC and an SCI
>> interrupt override in
On 2/15/2016 7:26 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> A crash has been observed when assigning penalty on x86 systems.
>>
>> It looks like this problem happens on x86 platforms with IOAPIC and an SCI
>> interrupt override in the ACPI table with
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> A crash has been observed when assigning penalty on x86 systems.
>
> It looks like this problem happens on x86 platforms with IOAPIC and an SCI
> interrupt override in the ACPI table with interrupt number greater than
>
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> A crash has been observed when assigning penalty on x86 systems.
>
> It looks like this problem happens on x86 platforms with IOAPIC and an SCI
> interrupt override in the ACPI table with interrupt number greater than
> 16. (22 in this example)
A crash has been observed when assigning penalty on x86 systems.
It looks like this problem happens on x86 platforms with IOAPIC and an SCI
interrupt override in the ACPI table with interrupt number greater than
16. (22 in this example)
The bug has been introduced by "ACPI, PCI, irq: remove
A crash has been observed when assigning penalty on x86 systems.
It looks like this problem happens on x86 platforms with IOAPIC and an SCI
interrupt override in the ACPI table with interrupt number greater than
16. (22 in this example)
The bug has been introduced by "ACPI, PCI, irq: remove
10 matches
Mail list logo