On Jan 31, 2005, at 11:01 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
Also you might not want to magically force settings like highmem
because
you want that for multi-target kernels - Geode is a sort of odd case
where it almost makes sense but its different enough to make me
dubious.
I've already taken that out.
In fact
On Iau, 2005-01-27 at 06:54, Dan Malek wrote:
> Hi Marcelo!
>
> Here is a patch for 2.4 that adds the basic AMD Geode GX2/GX3
> and GX1/SC1200 support. This patch updates configuration
> scripts, defconfig, and setup files.
GX2 seems no different to the older Cyrix/NS settings. GX3 a little
diff
Hi!
> >We do not disable HIGHMEM_64GB for 486, I do not see why we should add
> >extra code to geode...
>
> What about some of the other ones like MTRR and IOAPIC?
> I was kinda passing this along from someone I thought knew
> better than I, but I didn't like it either. It seems just setting the
On Jan 27, 2005, at 9:15 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
We do not disable HIGHMEM_64GB for 486, I do not see why we should add
extra code to geode...
What about some of the other ones like MTRR and IOAPIC?
I was kinda passing this along from someone I thought knew
better than I, but I didn't like it eithe
Hi!
> Here is a patch for 2.4 that adds the basic AMD Geode GX2/GX3
> and GX1/SC1200 support. This patch updates configuration
> scripts, defconfig, and setup files.
Please inline patches...
We do not disable HIGHMEM_64GB for 486, I do not see why we should add
extra code to geode...
If you re
Hi Marcelo!
Here is a patch for 2.4 that adds the basic AMD Geode GX2/GX3
and GX1/SC1200 support. This patch updates configuration
scripts, defconfig, and setup files.
Signed-off-by: Dan Malek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
geode_x86.patch
Description: Binary data
6 matches
Mail list logo
