On Wednesday 31 August 2005 16:43, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 02:50:19PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On 8/18/05, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > @@ -500,9 +519,13 @@ int class_device_add(struct class_device
> > >}
> > >
> > >class_device_add_attrs(class
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 02:50:19PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On 8/18/05, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > @@ -500,9 +519,13 @@ int class_device_add(struct class_device
> >}
> >
> >class_device_add_attrs(class_dev);
> > - if (class_dev->dev)
> > + if (class_d
On 8/18/05, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> @@ -500,9 +519,13 @@ int class_device_add(struct class_device
>}
>
>class_device_add_attrs(class_dev);
> - if (class_dev->dev)
> + if (class_dev->dev) {
> + class_name = make_class_name(class_dev);
>
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 12:04:42AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> Matthew, this work for you?
Yep, that's fine by me. Thanks.
--
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and will
thew Wilcox; Smart, James; Andrew Morton; SCSI Mailing List;
> Linux Kernel; Alan Cox; Russell King; Dmitry Torokhov
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] add transport class symlink to device object
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:23:11PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2
> They are class devices called ttyS0, ttyS1, ttyS2 so you can say
> they're uniquely named.
>
> The problem is that Matthew wants to add a symlink from the device
> device to the class device to complement the class device to device
> symlink, since we end up with multiple symlinks in the devices
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 07:50:27AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 11:41:29PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 07:30:50AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:21:56PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 09:32:44AM +0100,
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 11:41:29PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 07:30:50AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:21:56PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 09:32:44AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 01:43:03AM +0100,
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 07:30:50AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:21:56PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 09:32:44AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 01:43:03AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 11:25:25PM
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:23:11PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 05:41:17PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > Actually, isn't the fix to all of this to combine Greg and James'
> > patches?
>
> Yes it is.
>
> > The Greg one fails in SCSI because we don't have unique class device
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:21:56PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 09:32:44AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 01:43:03AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 11:25:25PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > > > Eww. Do you really want one struc
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 09:32:44AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 01:43:03AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 11:25:25PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > > Eww. Do you really want one struct device per tty with all the
> > > memory each one eats?
> > >
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 05:41:17PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 16:02 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > /sys/class/tty/ttyS0/device ->
> > ../../../devices/parisc/0/0:0/pci:00/:00:04.0
> > /sys/class/tty/ttyS1/device ->
> > ../../../devices/parisc/0/0:0/pci:00/
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 09:37:18AM -0400, Luben Tuikov wrote:
> On 08/15/05 20:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > My vote is to make the multiplexor instantiate each serial line
> > as a separate device.
>
> Yes, you're absolutely and completely correct. I think the same
> way as you do.
Just don'
> On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 20:52 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > What is ":00:04:0" in this case ? The "device" is not a serial
> > port, which is what the ttyXX back link would lead you to believe.
> > Thus, it's a serial port multiplexer that supports up to N ports,
> > right ? and wouldn't
On 08/15/05 21:08, James Bottomley wrote:
>>Think if SCSI used this same style of representation. For example,
>>if there was no scsi target device entity, but class entities did
>>exist and they just pointed back to the scsi host device entry.
>
>
> Yes, it's theoretically possible to have had S
On 08/15/05 20:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Actually, I view this as being a little odd...
>
> What is ":00:04:0" in this case ? The "device" is not a serial
> port, which is what the ttyXX back link would lead you to believe.
> Thus, it's a serial port multiplexer that supports up to N port
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 20:52 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What is ":00:04:0" in this case ? The "device" is not a serial
> port, which is what the ttyXX back link would lead you to believe.
> Thus, it's a serial port multiplexer that supports up to N ports,
> right ? and wouldn't the more c
Actually, I view this as being a little odd...
What is ":00:04:0" in this case ? The "device" is not a serial
port, which is what the ttyXX back link would lead you to believe.
Thus, it's a serial port multiplexer that supports up to N ports,
right ? and wouldn't the more correct representatio
On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 16:02 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> /sys/class/tty/ttyS0/device ->
> ../../../devices/parisc/0/0:0/pci:00/:00:04.0
> /sys/class/tty/ttyS1/device ->
> ../../../devices/parisc/0/0:0/pci:00/:00:04.0
> /sys/class/tty/ttyS2/device ->
> ../../../devices/parisc/0/
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 01:43:03AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 11:25:25PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > Eww. Do you really want one struct device per tty with all the
> > memory each one eats?
> >
> > If that's really what you want you need to talk to Alan and not me.
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 11:25:25PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 04:02:31PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > Last time I tried to do something like this, it fell over with
> > multi-function serial ports. Look at this example:
> >
> > # ls -l /sys/class/tty/ttyS*/device | c
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 04:02:31PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 02:39:56PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > Heh, I already have a patch like this pending for 2.6.14 at:
> >
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/gregkh-01-driver/driver-link-devic
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 02:39:56PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> Heh, I already have a patch like this pending for 2.6.14 at:
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/gregkh-01-driver/driver-link-device-and-class.patch
Last time I tried to do something like this, it fel
24 matches
Mail list logo
