Re: [PATCH] alpha: Fix build around srm_sysrq_reboot_op

2020-06-15 Thread Emil Velikov
Hi all, On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 10:11, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > From: Joerg Roedel > > The patch introducing the struct was probably never compile tested, > because it sets a handler with a wrong function signature. Wrap the > handler into a functions with the correct signature to fix the build. >

Re: [PATCH] alpha: Fix build around srm_sysrq_reboot_op

2020-06-12 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 2:14 AM Joerg Roedel wrote: > > From: Joerg Roedel > > The patch introducing the struct was probably never compile tested, > because it sets a handler with a wrong function signature. Wrap the > handler into a functions with the correct signature to fix the build. > > Fixe

Re: [PATCH] alpha: Fix build around srm_sysrq_reboot_op

2020-06-11 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 11:11:39AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > From: Joerg Roedel > > The patch introducing the struct was probably never compile tested, > because it sets a handler with a wrong function signature. Wrap the > handler into a functions with the correct signature to fix the build.

[PATCH] alpha: Fix build around srm_sysrq_reboot_op

2020-06-11 Thread Joerg Roedel
From: Joerg Roedel The patch introducing the struct was probably never compile tested, because it sets a handler with a wrong function signature. Wrap the handler into a functions with the correct signature to fix the build. Fixes: 0f1c9688a194 ("tty/sysrq: alpha: export and use __sysrq_get_key_