On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 8:21 PM John Johansen
wrote:
>
> On 08/23/2018 07:09 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> thank you for the patch, but a fix for this issue was pushed to apparmor-next
> yesterday
>
Ok, good. As several people pointed out, my patch was also wrong, so that
saves me doing another
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 8:21 PM John Johansen
wrote:
>
> On 08/23/2018 07:09 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> thank you for the patch, but a fix for this issue was pushed to apparmor-next
> yesterday
>
Ok, good. As several people pointed out, my patch was also wrong, so that
saves me doing another
On 08/23/2018 07:09 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
thank you for the patch, but a fix for this issue was pushed to apparmor-next
yesterday
> After the corresponding 'goto' was removed, we get a warning
> for the 'fail' label:
>
> security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c: In function 'unpack_dfa':
>
On 08/23/2018 07:09 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
thank you for the patch, but a fix for this issue was pushed to apparmor-next
yesterday
> After the corresponding 'goto' was removed, we get a warning
> for the 'fail' label:
>
> security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c: In function 'unpack_dfa':
>
Arnd Bergmann writes:
> After the corresponding 'goto' was removed, we get a warning
> for the 'fail' label:
>
> security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c: In function 'unpack_dfa':
> security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c:426:1: error: label 'fail' defined but not
> used [-Werror=unused-label]
>
> Fixes:
Arnd Bergmann writes:
> After the corresponding 'goto' was removed, we get a warning
> for the 'fail' label:
>
> security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c: In function 'unpack_dfa':
> security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c:426:1: error: label 'fail' defined but not
> used [-Werror=unused-label]
>
> Fixes:
On 2018/08/23 23:21, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 7:09 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> After the corresponding 'goto' was removed, we get a warning
>> for the 'fail' label:
>>
>> security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c: In function 'unpack_dfa':
>> security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c:426:1:
On 2018/08/23 23:21, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 7:09 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> After the corresponding 'goto' was removed, we get a warning
>> for the 'fail' label:
>>
>> security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c: In function 'unpack_dfa':
>> security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c:426:1:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 7:09 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> After the corresponding 'goto' was removed, we get a warning
> for the 'fail' label:
>
> security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c: In function 'unpack_dfa':
> security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c:426:1: error: label 'fail' defined but not
> used
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 7:09 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> After the corresponding 'goto' was removed, we get a warning
> for the 'fail' label:
>
> security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c: In function 'unpack_dfa':
> security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c:426:1: error: label 'fail' defined but not
> used
After the corresponding 'goto' was removed, we get a warning
for the 'fail' label:
security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c: In function 'unpack_dfa':
security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c:426:1: error: label 'fail' defined but not
used [-Werror=unused-label]
Fixes: fb5841091f28 ("apparmor: remove no-op
After the corresponding 'goto' was removed, we get a warning
for the 'fail' label:
security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c: In function 'unpack_dfa':
security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c:426:1: error: label 'fail' defined but not
used [-Werror=unused-label]
Fixes: fb5841091f28 ("apparmor: remove no-op
12 matches
Mail list logo
