Re: [PATCH] arch-sh csum_partial_copy_generic() bugfix

2005-09-02 Thread Ollie Wild
Adrian Bunk wrote: On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 10:26:56AM -0700, Ollie Wild wrote: It's been about a week since I posted this bug report, and I haven't gotten any responses. Is there someone I should contact directly? Can someone please point me in the right direction? The MAINTAINERS

Re: [PATCH] arch-sh csum_partial_copy_generic() bugfix

2005-09-02 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 10:26:56AM -0700, Ollie Wild wrote: > It's been about a week since I posted this bug report, and I haven't > gotten any responses. Is there someone I should contact directly? Can > someone please point me in the right direction? The MAINTAINERS file in the kernel sourc

Re: [PATCH] arch-sh csum_partial_copy_generic() bugfix

2005-09-02 Thread Ollie Wild
It's been about a week since I posted this bug report, and I haven't gotten any responses. Is there someone I should contact directly? Can someone please point me in the right direction? Thanks, Ollie Ollie Wild wrote: There's a bug in Hitachi SuperH csum_partial_copy_generic() implementat

[PATCH] arch-sh csum_partial_copy_generic() bugfix

2005-08-25 Thread Ollie Wild
There's a bug in Hitachi SuperH csum_partial_copy_generic() implementation. If the supplied length is 1 (and several alignment conditions are met), the function immediately branches to label 4. However, the assembly at label 4 expects the length to be stored in register r2. Since this has no