On Tuesday 27 May 2014 19:28:06 Corey Minyard wrote:
> On 05/27/2014 02:27 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 May 2014 11:53:59 Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> On 05/27/14 11:49, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>> You also commented in that thread about stop_critical_timings()/
> >>> start_critical_timing
On 05/27/2014 02:27 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 May 2014 11:53:59 Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 05/27/14 11:49, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> You also commented in that thread about stop_critical_timings()/
>>> start_critical_timings(). Corey, can you look at that, too? I
>>> think it's designe
On 05/27/14 12:39, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 May 2014 12:33:38 Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 05/27/14 12:27, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 27 May 2014 11:53:59 Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 05/27/14 11:49, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> You also commented in that thread about stop_critical_t
On Tuesday 27 May 2014 12:33:38 Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 05/27/14 12:27, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 May 2014 11:53:59 Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> On 05/27/14 11:49, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>> You also commented in that thread about stop_critical_timings()/
> >>> start_critical_timings(). C
On 05/27/14 12:27, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 May 2014 11:53:59 Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 05/27/14 11:49, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> You also commented in that thread about stop_critical_timings()/
>>> start_critical_timings(). Corey, can you look at that, too? I
>>> think it's designed to
On Tuesday 27 May 2014 11:53:59 Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 05/27/14 11:49, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > You also commented in that thread about stop_critical_timings()/
> > start_critical_timings(). Corey, can you look at that, too? I
> > think it's designed to avoid the issue you are seeing but
> >
On 05/27/14 11:49, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> You also commented in that thread about stop_critical_timings()/
> start_critical_timings(). Corey, can you look at that, too? I
> think it's designed to avoid the issue you are seeing but
> for some reason doesn't.
I sent a patch last week to "solve" th
On 05/27/2014 11:16 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 May 2014, Corey Minyard wrote:
>> On 05/26/2014 04:26 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Sunday 25 May 2014 14:15:23 miny...@acm.org wrote:
From: Corey Minyard
The CPU will go to idle with interrupts off, but the interrupts
>
On Tuesday 27 May 2014 18:38:33 Stanislav Meduna wrote:
> On 26.05.2014 11:26, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > It seems like the right thing to do, I just don't understand
> > why nobody hit this before.
>
> Looks like this is what I did hit a month ago and
> was not able to find the culprit:
> http:/
On 26.05.2014 11:26, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> It seems like the right thing to do, I just don't understand
> why nobody hit this before.
Looks like this is what I did hit a month ago and
was not able to find the culprit:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rt-users/msg11656.html
> How exactly do yo
On Tuesday 27 May 2014, Corey Minyard wrote:
> On 05/26/2014 04:26 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Sunday 25 May 2014 14:15:23 miny...@acm.org wrote:
> >> From: Corey Minyard
> >>
> >> The CPU will go to idle with interrupts off, but the interrupts
> >> will wake up the idle. This was causing ver
On 05/26/2014 04:26 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sunday 25 May 2014 14:15:23 miny...@acm.org wrote:
>> From: Corey Minyard
>>
>> The CPU will go to idle with interrupts off, but the interrupts
>> will wake up the idle. This was causing very long irqsoff trace
>> values because, basically, the wh
On Sunday 25 May 2014 14:15:23 miny...@acm.org wrote:
> From: Corey Minyard
>
> The CPU will go to idle with interrupts off, but the interrupts
> will wake up the idle. This was causing very long irqsoff trace
> values because, basically, the whole idle time was traces with
> irqs off, even thou
From: Corey Minyard
The CPU will go to idle with interrupts off, but the interrupts
will wake up the idle. This was causing very long irqsoff trace
values because, basically, the whole idle time was traces with
irqs off, even though they weren't really off. Rework the idle
code to turn hardirq
14 matches
Mail list logo