On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 03:13:00PM +0800, zhangzhiqiang wrote:
> On 2014/10/9 11:41, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:07:04AM +0800, zhangzhiqiang wrote:
> >> On 2014/10/8 21:38, Will Deacon wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 02:31:47PM +0100,
On 2014/10/9 11:41, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:07:04AM +0800, zhangzhiqiang wrote:
>> On 2014/10/8 21:38, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 02:31:47PM +0100, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 10:17:41AM +0100, Will
On 2014/10/9 11:41, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:07:04AM +0800, zhangzhiqiang wrote:
On 2014/10/8 21:38, Will Deacon wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 02:31:47PM +0100, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 10:17:41AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 03:13:00PM +0800, zhangzhiqiang wrote:
On 2014/10/9 11:41, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:07:04AM +0800, zhangzhiqiang wrote:
On 2014/10/8 21:38, Will Deacon wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 02:31:47PM +0100, gre...@linuxfoundation.org
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:07:04AM +0800, zhangzhiqiang wrote:
> On 2014/10/8 21:38, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 02:31:47PM +0100, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 10:17:41AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 04:06:12AM +0100,
On 2014/10/8 21:38, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 02:31:47PM +0100, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 10:17:41AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 04:06:12AM +0100, zhangzhiqiang wrote:
hi all,
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 02:31:47PM +0100, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 10:17:41AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 04:06:12AM +0100, zhangzhiqiang wrote:
> > > hi all,
> > >
> > >
> > > ref-cycles event
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 10:17:41AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 04:06:12AM +0100, zhangzhiqiang wrote:
> > hi all,
> >
> >
> > ref-cycles event is specially to Intel core, but can still used in arm
> > architecture
> > with the
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 04:06:12AM +0100, zhangzhiqiang wrote:
> hi all,
>
>
> ref-cycles event is specially to Intel core, but can still used in arm
> architecture
> with the wrong return value with 3.10 stable. for instance:
>
> perf stat -e
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 04:06:12AM +0100, zhangzhiqiang wrote:
hi all,
ref-cycles event is specially to Intel core, but can still used in arm
architecture
with the wrong return value with 3.10 stable. for instance:
perf stat -e ref-cycles sleep
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 10:17:41AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 04:06:12AM +0100, zhangzhiqiang wrote:
hi all,
ref-cycles event is specially to Intel core, but can still used in arm
architecture
with the wrong return
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 02:31:47PM +0100, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 10:17:41AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 04:06:12AM +0100, zhangzhiqiang wrote:
hi all,
ref-cycles event is specially to
On 2014/10/8 21:38, Will Deacon wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 02:31:47PM +0100, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 10:17:41AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 04:06:12AM +0100, zhangzhiqiang wrote:
hi all,
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:07:04AM +0800, zhangzhiqiang wrote:
On 2014/10/8 21:38, Will Deacon wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 02:31:47PM +0100, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 10:17:41AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 04:06:12AM +0100,
hi all,
ref-cycles event is specially to Intel core, but can still used in arm
architecture
with the wrong return value with 3.10 stable. for instance:
perf stat -e ref-cycles sleep 1
Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1':
0 ref-cycles
hi all,
ref-cycles event is specially to Intel core, but can still used in arm
architecture
with the wrong return value with 3.10 stable. for instance:
perf stat -e ref-cycles sleep 1
Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1':
0 ref-cycles
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
arm: armv7: perf: fix armv7 ref-cycles error
to the 3.16-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
arm: armv7: perf: fix armv7 ref-cycles error
to the 3.16-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
hi all,
ref-cycles event is specially to Intel core, but can still used in arm
architecture
with the wrong return value with 3.10 stable. this patch fix the bug and make
it return NOT SUPPORTED
distinctly.
In upstream this bug has been fixed by other
hi all,
ref-cycles event is specially to Intel core, but can still used in arm
architecture
with the wrong return value with 3.10 stable. this patch fix the bug and make
it return NOT SUPPORTED
distinctly.
In upstream this bug has been fixed by other
20 matches
Mail list logo