Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: am335x-pocketbeagle: add gpio-line-names

2020-06-18 Thread Drew Fustini
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 10:03:45AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Drew Fustini [200617 17:10]: > > Tony - does this look ok for 5.9? > > Yes looks OK to me. > > Just wondering, are the line with "NA" not used internally either? > If the "NA" lines are used internally, we should probably use >

Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: am335x-pocketbeagle: add gpio-line-names

2020-06-18 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Drew Fustini [200617 17:10]: > Tony - does this look ok for 5.9? Yes looks OK to me. Just wondering, are the line with "NA" not used internally either? If the "NA" lines are used internally, we should probably use "Reserved" or "Internal" or something like that to avoid later on having to

Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: am335x-pocketbeagle: add gpio-line-names

2020-06-17 Thread Drew Fustini
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 04:25:04PM +0200, Drew Fustini wrote: > The BeagleBoard.org PocketBeagle has P1 and P2 headers [0] which expose > many of the TI AM3358 SoC balls to stacking expansion boards called > "capes", or to other external connections like jumper wires connected > to a breadboard.

[PATCH] arm: dts: am335x-pocketbeagle: add gpio-line-names

2020-06-09 Thread Drew Fustini
The BeagleBoard.org PocketBeagle has P1 and P2 headers [0] which expose many of the TI AM3358 SoC balls to stacking expansion boards called "capes", or to other external connections like jumper wires connected to a breadboard. Note: the AM3358 die is actually embedded inside of the OSD335x-SM