Hi!
> >You can do without ret variable... Also more detailed changelog would
> >be nice... like what exact problem this works around.
> >
>
> Sure i can, but I don't see a reason to ignore SM's return value. Changelog
> of what?
>
> I guess if you read the thread over the ML you'll have your
Hi,
> Оригинално писмо
>От: Pavel Machek
>Относно: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround
>До: Pali Rohár
>Изпратено на: Събота, 2013, Март 30 20:36:54 EET
>
>
>Hi!
>
>> +u32 rx51_secure_dispatcher(u32 idx, u
Hi!
> +u32 rx51_secure_dispatcher(u32 idx, u32 flag, u32 nargs, u32 arg1, u32 arg2,
> +u32 arg3, u32 arg4)
> +{
> + u32 ret;
> + u32 param[5];
> +
> + param[0] = nargs+1;
> + param[1] = arg1;
> + param[2] = arg2;
> + param[3] = arg3;
> + param[4]
* Ивайло Димитров [130327 22:34]:
> Tony,
>
> Who do you expect to make that code merge? Do you expect us to mechanically
> merge RX51 PPA API patch with the existing generic OMAP PPA API code putting
> #ifdefs all over the place? Not that it is impossible, but the only real
> piece of HW I h
* Santosh Shilimkar [130328 03:10]:
> On Thursday 28 March 2013 03:20 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 01:56:07PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >> * Pali Rohár [130324 07:31]:
> >>> it is possible to upstream errata 430973 workaround for RX-51?
> >>
> >> I think we
On Thursday 28 March 2013 03:20 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 01:56:07PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Pali Rohár [130324 07:31]:
>>> it is possible to upstream errata 430973 workaround for RX-51?
>>
>> I think we should make the SMC handling a generic function f
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 01:56:07PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Pali Rohár [130324 07:31]:
> > it is possible to upstream errata 430973 workaround for RX-51?
>
> I think we should make the SMC handling a generic function for ARM.
>
> AFAIK just the SMC call numbering is different for various
e the code will still work on
the other platforms besides RX51, once the code modified. Please, advice on how
to proceed.
Regards,
Ivo
> Оригинално писмо
>От: Tony Lindgren
>Относно: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround
>До: Pali Rohá
* Pali Rohár [130324 07:31]:
> it is possible to upstream errata 430973 workaround for RX-51?
I think we should make the SMC handling a generic function for ARM.
AFAIK just the SMC call numbering is different for various
implementations. So the handler and passing of the parameters
seems like it
* Pali Rohár [130327 14:09]:
> On Wednesday 27 March 2013 21:56:07 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Pali Rohár [130324 07:31]:
> > > it is possible to upstream errata 430973 workaround for
> > > RX-51?
> >
> > I think we should make the SMC handling a generic function for
> > ARM.
> >
> > AFAIK just
On Wednesday 27 March 2013 21:56:07 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Pali Rohár [130324 07:31]:
> > it is possible to upstream errata 430973 workaround for
> > RX-51?
>
> I think we should make the SMC handling a generic function for
> ARM.
>
> AFAIK just the SMC call numbering is different for various
On Wednesday 06 March 2013 20:13:15 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 March 2013 18:51:21 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Pali Rohár [130306 06:13]:
> > > On Monday 04 March 2013 19:58:06 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > * Nishanth Menon [130301 06:42]:
> > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Ивайло Д
On Wednesday 06 March 2013 18:51:21 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Pali Rohár [130306 06:13]:
> > On Monday 04 March 2013 19:58:06 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > * Nishanth Menon [130301 06:42]:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Ивайло Димитров
> >
> > wrote:
> > > > > They look similar, but they a
* Pali Rohár [130306 06:13]:
> On Monday 04 March 2013 19:58:06 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Nishanth Menon [130301 06:42]:
> > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Ивайло Димитров
> wrote:
> > > > They look similar, but they are not equivalent :). The
> > > > first major difference is here (code ta
On Monday 04 March 2013 19:58:06 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Nishanth Menon [130301 06:42]:
> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Ивайло Димитров
wrote:
> > > They look similar, but they are not equivalent :). The
> > > first major difference is here (code taken from
> > > omap-smc.S)
> > >
> > >> E
> Оригинално писмо
>От: Aaro Koskinen
>Относно: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround
>До: Ивайло Димитров
>Изпратено на: Събота, 2013, Март 2 01:51:39 EET
>
>
>On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:09:12PM +0200, Ивайло Димитров
* Nishanth Menon [130301 06:42]:
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Ивайло Димитров wrote:
> >
> > They look similar, but they are not equivalent :). The first major
> > difference is here (code taken from omap-smc.S)
> >
> >> ENTRY(omap_smc2)
> >> stmfd sp!, {r4-r12, lr}
> >>
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:09:12PM +0200, Ивайло Димитров wrote:
> Unfortunately it is necessary, on RX-51 PPA/NOLO leaves IBE bit unset.
You sure? I think you need to explain this more - the commit message in
the original patch is empty/missing...
A.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the li
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Ивайло Димитров wrote:
>
> They look similar, but they are not equivalent :). The first major difference
> is here (code taken from omap-smc.S)
>
>> ENTRY(omap_smc2)
>> stmfd sp!, {r4-r12, lr}
>> mov r3, r2
>> mov r2, r1
>>
Unfortunately it is necessary, on RX-51 PPA/NOLO leaves IBE bit unset.
> Оригинално писмо
>От: Peter De Schrijver
>Относно: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround
>До: Pali Rohár
>Изпратено на: Петък, 2013, Март 1 11:43:14 EET
>
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:42:28AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov
> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile|1 +
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-secure.c | 66
> +++
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51
I wonder does
it worth. Not to say that I don't have BB around to test if the code still
works if I make changes to omap2-secure.c/omap-smc.S :)
> Оригинално писмо --------
>От: Nishanth Menon
>Относно: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround
>До
On 10:42-20130228, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov
> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile|1 +
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-secure.c | 66
> +++
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-secure.h | 36 ++
Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile|1 +
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-secure.c | 66 +++
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-secure.h | 36 +
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-smc.S
24 matches
Mail list logo
