Hi.
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 5:20 PM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>
> Hey Masahiro,
>
> I'm not sure exactly. I did just notice another place --be8 is being added:
That is not my question.
I just asked about your commit log:
"big-endian ARM was relying on gcc to translate
its -mbe8 option into ld's
Hey Masahiro,
Considering ARM big endian userland is pretty badly broken without
this, we should probably have this merged in the next rc or rather
soon. Was there additional information you needed? Would you prefer
Russell queues up my patch or did you want to make further build
system changes?
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 11:01:23AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> Thanks for catching this.
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 3:26 AM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> >
> > The commit fe00e50b2db8 ("ARM: 8858/1: vdso: use $(LD) instead of $(CC)
> > to link VDSO") removed the passing of CFLAG
Hey Masahiro,
I'm not sure exactly. I did just notice another place --be8 is being added:
ifeq ($(CONFIG_CPU_ENDIAN_BE8),y)
LDFLAGS_vmlinux += --be8
KBUILD_LDFLAGS_MODULE += --be8
endif
I suppose it's possible that this is kbuild related where one of those
isn't winding up in the right place.
Hi Jason,
Thanks for catching this.
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 3:26 AM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>
> The commit fe00e50b2db8 ("ARM: 8858/1: vdso: use $(LD) instead of $(CC)
> to link VDSO") removed the passing of CFLAGS, since ld doesn't take
> those directly. However, prior, big-endian ARM was rel
The commit fe00e50b2db8 ("ARM: 8858/1: vdso: use $(LD) instead of $(CC)
to link VDSO") removed the passing of CFLAGS, since ld doesn't take
those directly. However, prior, big-endian ARM was relying on gcc to
translate its -mbe8 option into ld's --be8 option. Lacking this, ld
generated be32 code, m
6 matches
Mail list logo
