On 04/07/2016 11:56 AM, Al Stone wrote:
> config DEVPORT
> bool
> depends on ISA && PCI
> default y
>
> That makes more sense. Thanks.
I think Itanium does IO ports but not ISA. Probably best to just turn on
IO ports on the three architectures that use them in that case.
On 04/07/2016 11:56 AM, Al Stone wrote:
> config DEVPORT
> bool
> depends on ISA && PCI
> default y
>
> That makes more sense. Thanks.
I think Itanium does IO ports but not ISA. Probably best to just turn on
IO ports on the three architectures that use them in that case.
On Thursday 07 April 2016, Al Stone wrote:
> >>> config DEVPORT
> >>> bool
> >>> - depends on !M68K
> >>> + depends on !M68K && !ARM64
> >>
> >> Why not fix the real bug here, it's odd that only these two arches need
> >> this disabled, don't you agree?
>
> Agreed. It does seem
On Thursday 07 April 2016, Al Stone wrote:
> >>> config DEVPORT
> >>> bool
> >>> - depends on !M68K
> >>> + depends on !M68K && !ARM64
> >>
> >> Why not fix the real bug here, it's odd that only these two arches need
> >> this disabled, don't you agree?
>
> Agreed. It does seem
On 04/07/2016 01:26 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 03:27:20PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
>>> On arm64 systems, using /dev/port does not really make sense; this is
>>> historically used
On 04/07/2016 01:26 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 03:27:20PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
>>> On arm64 systems, using /dev/port does not really make sense; this is
>>> historically used for other architectures to
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 03:27:20PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
>> On arm64 systems, using /dev/port does not really make sense; this is
>> historically used for other architectures to access ISA IO ports, which
>>
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 03:27:20PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
>> On arm64 systems, using /dev/port does not really make sense; this is
>> historically used for other architectures to access ISA IO ports, which
>> with any luck do not exist
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 03:27:20PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> On arm64 systems, using /dev/port does not really make sense; this is
> historically used for other architectures to access ISA IO ports, which
> with any luck do not exist on arm64 platforms. With the following snippet
> of perl code
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 03:27:20PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> On arm64 systems, using /dev/port does not really make sense; this is
> historically used for other architectures to access ISA IO ports, which
> with any luck do not exist on arm64 platforms. With the following snippet
> of perl code
On arm64 systems, using /dev/port does not really make sense; this is
historically used for other architectures to access ISA IO ports, which
with any luck do not exist on arm64 platforms. With the following snippet
of perl code (from Jeff Bastian ), we can reliably
panic an
On arm64 systems, using /dev/port does not really make sense; this is
historically used for other architectures to access ISA IO ports, which
with any luck do not exist on arm64 platforms. With the following snippet
of perl code (from Jeff Bastian ), we can reliably
panic an arm64 system with PCI
12 matches
Mail list logo