Hi gengdongjiu,
[auto build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core]
[also build test ERROR on v4.13 next-20170906]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/gengdongjiu/arm64-KVM-VHE-save-and-re
...@linaro.org,pbonz...@redhat.com,rkrc...@redhat.com,linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org,kvm...@lists.cs.columbia.edu,k...@vger.kernel.org,linux-kernel,suzuki.poul...@arm.com,mark.rutl...@arm.com,Catalin
> Marinas
> *抄送：*James Morse,张海斌,黄韶宇
> *时间：*2017-09-06 22:41:09
> *主题:*Re: [P
On 06/09/17 15:10, gengdongjiu wrote:
> Hi, Vladimir
>
Do you see effect of "PAN is unexpectedly enabled"?
>>> In fact I did not encounter this case, but I think it can exist.
>>> I think if host OS dynamically disable PAN, it wants the host kernel access
>>> the user space address space not
Hi, Vladimir
> >> Do you see effect of "PAN is unexpectedly enabled"?
> > In fact I did not encounter this case, but I think it can exist.
> > I think if host OS dynamically disable PAN, it wants the host kernel access
> > the user space address space not through copy_to/from_user
> API.
> > Now
On 06/09/17 13:44, gengdongjiu wrote:
>
>
> On 2017/9/6 20:30, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>> On 06/09/17 13:14, gengdongjiu wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2017/9/6 20:00, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
On 06/09/17 11:35, gengdongjiu wrote:
> Vladimir,
>
> On 2017/9/6 17:41, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>>>
On 2017/9/6 20:30, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> On 06/09/17 13:14, gengdongjiu wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2017/9/6 20:00, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>>> On 06/09/17 11:35, gengdongjiu wrote:
Vladimir,
On 2017/9/6 17:41, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> Can you please elaborate on cases where PAN is no
On 2017/9/6 20:00, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> On 06/09/17 11:35, gengdongjiu wrote:
>> Vladimir,
>>
>> On 2017/9/6 17:41, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>>> Can you please elaborate on cases where PAN is not enabled?
>>
>> I mean the informal private usage, For example, he disabled the PAN
>> dynamically
On 06/09/17 13:14, gengdongjiu wrote:
>
>
> On 2017/9/6 20:00, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>> On 06/09/17 11:35, gengdongjiu wrote:
>>> Vladimir,
>>>
>>> On 2017/9/6 17:41, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
Can you please elaborate on cases where PAN is not enabled?
>>>
>>> I mean the informal private usage
On 2017/9/6 20:00, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> On 06/09/17 11:35, gengdongjiu wrote:
>> Vladimir,
>>
>> On 2017/9/6 17:41, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>>> Can you please elaborate on cases where PAN is not enabled?
>>
>> I mean the informal private usage, For example, he disabled the PAN
>> dynamically
On 06/09/17 11:35, gengdongjiu wrote:
> Vladimir,
>
> On 2017/9/6 17:41, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>> Can you please elaborate on cases where PAN is not enabled?
>
> I mean the informal private usage, For example, he disabled the PAN
> dynamically to let kernel space to access the user space.
> Aft
Vladimir,
On 2017/9/6 17:41, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> Can you please elaborate on cases where PAN is not enabled?
I mean the informal private usage, For example, he disabled the PAN dynamically
to let kernel space to access the user space.
After he dynamic disabled the PAN, then switched to gues
For UAO, if not save/restore PSTATE.UAO, we can use below fixing.
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
index 9341376..c3dd761 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
#include
#include
+#include
On 06/09/17 10:32, gengdongjiu wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On 2017/9/6 16:17, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 05/09/17 19:58, gengdongjiu wrote:
>>> when exit from guest, some host PSTATE bits may be lost, such as
>>> PSTATE.PAN or PSTATE.UAO. It is because host and hypervisor all run
>>> in the EL2, host PST
Hi Marc,
On 2017/9/6 16:17, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 05/09/17 19:58, gengdongjiu wrote:
>> when exit from guest, some host PSTATE bits may be lost, such as
>> PSTATE.PAN or PSTATE.UAO. It is because host and hypervisor all run
>> in the EL2, host PSTATE value cannot be saved and restored via
>> SP
On 05/09/17 19:58, gengdongjiu wrote:
> when exit from guest, some host PSTATE bits may be lost, such as
> PSTATE.PAN or PSTATE.UAO. It is because host and hypervisor all run
> in the EL2, host PSTATE value cannot be saved and restored via
> SPSR_EL2. So if guest has changed the PSTATE, host contin
CC Catalin
On 2017/9/6 2:58, gengdongjiu wrote:
> when exit from guest, some host PSTATE bits may be lost, such as
> PSTATE.PAN or PSTATE.UAO. It is because host and hypervisor all run
> in the EL2, host PSTATE value cannot be saved and restored via
> SPSR_EL2. So if guest has changed the PSTATE,
when exit from guest, some host PSTATE bits may be lost, such as
PSTATE.PAN or PSTATE.UAO. It is because host and hypervisor all run
in the EL2, host PSTATE value cannot be saved and restored via
SPSR_EL2. So if guest has changed the PSTATE, host continues with
a wrong value guest has set.
Signed-
17 matches
Mail list logo
