On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 04:58:43PM +, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> On Friday 13 Nov 2020 at 16:02:34 (+), Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 03:53:28PM +, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> > > Given that smp_call_function_single() can deadlock when interrupts are
> > > disabled, abort
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 04:58:43PM +, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> On Friday 13 Nov 2020 at 16:02:34 (+), Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 03:53:28PM +, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> > > Given that smp_call_function_single() can deadlock when interrupts are
> > > disabled, abort
On Friday 13 Nov 2020 at 16:02:34 (+), Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 03:53:28PM +, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> > Given that smp_call_function_single() can deadlock when interrupts are
> > disabled, abort the SMP call if irqs_disabled(). This scenario is
> > currently not
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 03:53:28PM +, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> Given that smp_call_function_single() can deadlock when interrupts are
> disabled, abort the SMP call if irqs_disabled(). This scenario is
> currently not possible given the function's uses, but safeguard this for
> potential
Given that smp_call_function_single() can deadlock when interrupts are
disabled, abort the SMP call if irqs_disabled(). This scenario is
currently not possible given the function's uses, but safeguard this for
potential future uses.
Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu
Cc: Catalin Marinas
Cc: Will
5 matches
Mail list logo