Harmless mistake, but it's incorrect. The DT spec provides recommendations
for the node names:
"The name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function
of the device and not its precise programming model. If appropriate, the
name should be one of the following choices:
...
interrupt-controller"

Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edwor...@renesas.com>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/al/alpine-v2.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/al/alpine-v2.dtsi 
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/al/alpine-v2.dtsi
index 5b7bef684256..6f35bab10e9d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/al/alpine-v2.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/al/alpine-v2.dtsi
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@
                                     <GIC_SPI 107 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
                };
 
-               gic: gic@f0100000 {
+               gic: interrupt-controller@f0100000 {
                        compatible = "arm,gic-v3";
                        reg = <0x0 0xf0200000 0x0 0x10000>,     /* GIC Dist */
                              <0x0 0xf0280000 0x0 0x200000>,    /* GICR */
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to