On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 06:12:06PM -0500, Li Yang wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 3:36 AM Michael Walle wrote:
> >
> > Don't enable the optee node in the SoC include. It is an optional
> > component and actually, if enabled, breaks boards which doesn't have it.
>
> Hi Shawn,
>
> Shall we make t
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 3:36 AM Michael Walle wrote:
>
> Don't enable the optee node in the SoC include. It is an optional
> component and actually, if enabled, breaks boards which doesn't have it.
Hi Shawn,
Shall we make this a general rule? I see quite a few SoC dtsi files
are having the opte
Am 2021-03-22 14:04, schrieb Sahil Malhotra:
Sahil, if you like you can pick it up to enable the nodes for your
ls1028a boards.
Michael, If we enable the optee node like this, will this gets resolved
?
I don't know what you mean. This was a fix for the initial patch. So,
I guess the answer is
Hi Sahil,
Am 2021-03-22 12:33, schrieb Sahil Malhotra:
Thanks for the fix, and currently we support optee only on ls1028a-rdb
boards.
Does enabling the optee node this way, solves the issue ?
What do you mean? Please note, that Shawn already reverted your commit.
Therefore, I suggest you make
Am 2021-03-18 09:34, schrieb Michael Walle:
Don't enable the optee node in the SoC include. It is an optional
component and actually, if enabled, breaks boards which doesn't have
it.
This reverts commit 48787485f8de ("arm64: dts: ls1028a: enable optee
node") and enables the node per board, ass
Don't enable the optee node in the SoC include. It is an optional
component and actually, if enabled, breaks boards which doesn't have it.
This reverts commit 48787485f8de ("arm64: dts: ls1028a: enable optee
node") and enables the node per board, assuming the intend of the
original author was to e
6 matches
Mail list logo
