Re: [PATCH] arm64: make STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK configurable.

2021-03-10 Thread Michal Suchánek
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 04:07:00AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 12:10 AM Michal Suchánek wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 11:53:21PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 10:35 PM Michal Suchánek wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at

Re: [PATCH] arm64: make STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK configurable.

2021-03-09 Thread Michal Suchánek
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 04:07:00AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 12:10 AM Michal Suchánek wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 11:53:21PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 10:35 PM Michal Suchánek wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at

Re: [PATCH] arm64: make STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK configurable.

2021-03-09 Thread Masahiro Yamada
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 12:10 AM Michal Suchánek wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 11:53:21PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 10:35 PM Michal Suchánek wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:22:36PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 9:35

Re: [PATCH] arm64: make STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK configurable.

2021-03-09 Thread Michal Suchánek
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 11:53:21PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 10:35 PM Michal Suchánek wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:22:36PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 9:35 PM Michal Suchanek wrote: > > > > > > > > When using dummy-tools STA

Re: [PATCH] arm64: make STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK configurable.

2021-03-09 Thread Masahiro Yamada
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 10:35 PM Michal Suchánek wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:22:36PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 9:35 PM Michal Suchanek wrote: > > > > > > When using dummy-tools STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK is unconditionally > > > selected. This defeats the purp

Re: [PATCH] arm64: make STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK configurable.

2021-03-09 Thread Michal Suchánek
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:22:36PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 9:35 PM Michal Suchanek wrote: > > > > When using dummy-tools STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK is unconditionally > > selected. This defeats the purpose of the all-enabled tool. > > > > Description copied from arm > >

Re: [PATCH] arm64: make STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK configurable.

2021-03-09 Thread Masahiro Yamada
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 9:35 PM Michal Suchanek wrote: > > When using dummy-tools STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK is unconditionally > selected. This defeats the purpose of the all-enabled tool. > > Description copied from arm > > Cc: Masahiro Yamada > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek Could you explain w

Re: [PATCH] arm64: make STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK configurable.

2021-03-09 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 13:37, Michal Suchanek wrote: > > When using dummy-tools STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK is unconditionally > selected. This defeats the purpose of the all-enabled tool. > What is dummy-tools and why should we care about it? > Description copied from arm > > Cc: Masahiro Yamada >

[PATCH] arm64: make STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK configurable.

2021-03-09 Thread Michal Suchanek
When using dummy-tools STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK is unconditionally selected. This defeats the purpose of the all-enabled tool. Description copied from arm Cc: Masahiro Yamada Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek --- arch/arm64/Kconfig | 13 - 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-